Top US, Iraqi Officials Begin To Doubt PM Malaki -NYT

[pearse1916]

NEW YORK -(Dow Jones)- Senior Iraqi and U.S. officials are beginning to question whether Prime Minister Nuri Kamal al-Maliki has the political muscle and decisiveness to hold Iraq together, The New York Times reported Wednesday.
Four months into his tenure, Maliki has failed to take aggressive steps to end the country's sectarian strife because they would alienate fundamentalist Shiite leaders inside his fractious government who have large followings and private armies, senior Iraqi politicians and Western officials say, The Times reported. He is also constrained by the need to woo militant Sunni Arabs connected to the insurgency.
EasyBourse actualité - Top US, Iraqi Officials Begin To Doubt PM Malaki -NYT (http://www.easybourse.com/Website/dynamic/News.php?NewsID=59365&lang=fra&NewsRubrique=2)

[PAn8tv]

Talabani was on Larry King live last night reports differently

[Free-Dinar]

Interesting,

NYTimes sucks, always has, so don't believe anything they write. (g)

Good luck to all, Mike

[Lux]

Interesting,

NYTimes sucks, always has, so don't believe anything they write. (g)

Good luck to all, Mike

They are unparelled in suck.

[Weston]

yeah because in a demoncracy everyone who votes for the same person heh :lmao:


edit: oh yeah I rememebered what Democracy did... Saddam Hussains did he always got 100% of the vote he was loved by the people~

[kerby team]

Talabani was on Larry King live last night reports differently

I saw that also and you are right on the money. Talabani is very pro-iraq, his position is very solid about the whole demcratic process. he also said he doesn't read the times as they are to negative.

[Integrity]

In certain circles within the US Intelligence community, the New York times has never been considered a reliable source of information. On the other hand if the article was written by Thomas Friedman, that would be something worth taking note.

[fauxdough]

Thomas Friedman is not a professional economist, is he? Doesn't he write mainly opinion pieces?
AND how many Republicans in Congress/Senate were worried about Osama when he was being "ignored" by Clinton?

[Integrity]

No he's not, but his information is absolutly on. One thing you can count on from him is truth, not fabrication, not biased, He doesn't have an agenda one of those rare journalist that remebers how to report the news. NOT his opinion