PDA

View Full Version : Possible New Currency for America


dicky1
11-30-2006, 11:54 AM
London stock trader urges move to 'amero'
Says many unaware of plan to replace dollar with N. American currency

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article....RTICLE_ID=53124 (http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53124)

Wooly
11-30-2006, 01:00 PM
That is scary....Amero... not what I would think as a good thing

Phil S
11-30-2006, 01:25 PM
The article compares this North American currency with the Euro, but the Euro was introduced for political reasons. Would the Amero benefit North America economically? If not the introduction of this currency would be pointless.

Gogovs
11-30-2006, 02:11 PM
London stock trader urges move to 'amero'
Says many unaware of plan to replace dollar with N. American currency

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article....RTICLE_ID=53124 (http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53124)


If this were true, you would need an open border policy like Europe. I can assure you, not going to happen here. We're trying to lock this place down not open it up.

tmorr37
11-30-2006, 02:57 PM
If this were true, you would need an open border policy like Europe. I can assure you, not going to happen here. We're trying to lock this place down not open it up.

I guess you haven't been paying attention. The dems have already killed the fence. The amero has been mentioned before with the date, if it sounds familar, of 2010.

Kansas City customs port considered Mexican soil?
WND investigation finds new evidence U.S. facility to be on foreign territory

Posted: July 5, 2006
1:00 a.m. Eastern



By Jerome R. Corsi
© 2006 WorldNetDaily.com
http://wnd.com/images2/smartport.jpg

A Mexican customs facility planned for Kansas City's inland port (http://www.kcsmartport.com/) may have to be considered the sovereign soil of Mexico as part of an effort to lure officials in that country into cooperating with the Missouri development project. Despite adamant denials by Kansas City Area Development Council officials, WND has obtained e-mails and other documents from top executives with the KCSmartPort project that suggest such a facility would by necessity be considered Mexican territory – despite its presence in the heartland of the U.S.

To date, the Kansas City Council has voted a $2.5 million loan to KC SmartPort to build the Mexican customs facility in the West Bottoms near Kemper Arena on city-owned land east of Liberty Street and mostly south of Interstate 670. (http://www.kcsmartport.com/sec_news/media/articles/kcstar_101405.htm)

On May 16, Bonner addressed the Chamber of Commerce in Kansas City, saying the Mexican customs facility idea "could be enormously important to Kansas City and the surrounding area, and would – or should – facilitate trade for U.S. exporters by expediting the border clearance process for U.S. goods and products exported to Mexico." Bonner added that "If the Kansas City SmartPort is implemented, Kansas City could become a major new trade link between the U.S. and Mexico." (http://www.cbp.gov/xp/cgov/newsroom/commissioner/speeches_statements/archives/2005/05162005_kansas.xml)


Among those copied on Gutierrez's e-mail of March 10, 2006, was George D. Blackwood, the president of NASCO (North America's Super Corridor Coalition, Inc.). (http://www.nascocorridor.com/) Blackwood is an attorney with Blackwood, Langworthy & Tyson in Kansas City. He also served as the former chairman of the North American International Trade Corridor Partnership, which he helped found in 1998 when he was serving as mayor pro tem of Kansas City. (http://www.nascocorridor.com/pages/about/board_members.htm) NASCO supports the Kansas City SmartPort's initiative to establish a Mexican customs facility as part of the NASCO SuperCorridor project.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
N. American students
trained for 'merger'
10 universities participate in 'model Parliament' in Mexico to simulate 'integration' of 3 nations
WorldNetDaily: N. American students trained for 'merger' (http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=52104)

The board of directors of NAFI include Robert A. Pastor, professor and director of the Center for North American Studies at American University and vice chairman of the Council on Foreign Relations Task Force on North America. He has testified before the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations on the idea of merging the United States, Mexico and Canada in a North American union stretching from Prudhoe Bay to Guatemala.
"What we need to do," Pastor instructed, "is forge a new North American Community. ... Instead of stopping North Americans on the borders, we ought to provide them with a secure, biometric border pass that would ease transit across the border like an E-Z pass permits our cars to speed through tolls." Pastor is the author of "Toward a North American Community (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0881323284/qid=1152111084/sr=2-1/ref=pd_bbs_b_2_1/102-7064593-4548165?s=books&v=glance&n=283155)," a book promoting the development of a North American union as a regional government and the adoption of the amero as a common monetary currency to replace the dollar and the peso.

tmorr37
11-30-2006, 03:04 PM
The article compares this North American currency with the Euro, but the Euro was introduced for political reasons. Would the Amero benefit North America economically? If not the introduction of this currency would be pointless.



Asked whether he would characterize the dollar's downside move as signaling a possible collapse, Mr Ritholtz told WND, "Not yet."
Ritholtz pointed out market professionals had long looked at a dollar collapse as a "low probability event," but the recent fall suggests "the probabilities have increased of a major dollar correction, or even of a collapse."

Waianae
12-01-2006, 12:59 AM
So the dollar is downsizing and the IQD is on the rise!

Asked whether he would characterize the dollar's downside move as signaling a possible collapse, Mr Ritholtz told WND, "Not yet."
Ritholtz pointed out market professionals had long looked at a dollar collapse as a "low probability event," but the recent fall suggests "the probabilities have increased of a major dollar correction, or even of a collapse."

So it appears that we are going to be partnering with Canada and Mexico; they currency is less er of a value then the USD, makes you wonder what might be happening next to further reduce the USD for the United States of America?

Lowes announced to their management employee the "new" currency will be coming; did not think it was going to be that soon, but the end is near!

Or is it the end?

misty
12-01-2006, 09:09 AM
So the dollar is downsizing and the IQD is on the rise!




So it appears that we are going to be partnering with Canada and Mexico; they currency is less er of a value then the USD, makes you wonder what might be happening next to further reduce the USD for the United States of America?

Lowes announced to their management employee the "new" currency will be coming; did not think it was going to be that soon, but the end is near!


Or is it the end?



Hey Canada's dollar is on the rise.

Teslyn
12-01-2006, 09:40 AM
One currency between Canada and the USA I can almost see.

Still seems kind of dumb considering I still need to use my passport to go to and come back from a place I use the same currency as.

Joining with Mexico seems just dumb. The peso isn't worth squat and it seems like their own government is experiencing some technical difficulties. Canada and the USA would gain NOTHING from such a move.

I don't know. I also would have a problem with not using the greenback. It's as much of an American icon as apple pie and baseball.

44special
12-01-2006, 01:52 PM
I've heard of a new, US, one dollar coin being minted for release in 07'. They've placed "In God We Trust" on the edge of the coin because they "ran out of room". Guess this is one way the liberals could get rid of it altogether. They keep pushing God out and we're in for one hell of a ride.

theflyer17
12-01-2006, 02:51 PM
Sure is funny how the democrats are getting blamed for any supposed merger when it is a fact that it is the Bush white house that is trying to slip all of this in under the radar without any congressional oversight. Maybe some of you might want to go back through the info in this thread and actually read it before you condemn people who are not even in power till Jan 1. Use a little common sense, who would be for this plan, democrats (unions, middle class) or republicans (big business, wealthy class).

tmorr37
12-01-2006, 06:13 PM
Sure is funny how the democrats are getting blamed for any supposed merger when it is a fact that it is the Bush white house that is trying to slip all of this in under the radar without any congressional oversight. Maybe some of you might want to go back through the info in this thread and actually read it before you condemn people who are not even in power till Jan 1. Use a little common sense, who would be for this plan, democrats (unions, middle class) or republicans (big business, wealthy class).

This is an on going situation of both dems and rep. Remember how Clinton started the NAFTA stuff. Probably started before that. I'm not sure I'm against it for national security reasons. If our enemies destroyed the US dollar this would be a way reprint and start a new America. Sure would play hell with china's stash of a trillion US dollars in there vault.
As for Mexico, well that is a lot of real estate to develop and there is hugh growth potential. They say it would go to the tip of south America.
Venezuela, Why do you think that has become a problem lately.
There are a lot of articles out there on this stuff. The Euro has worked out.

SHJAM
12-01-2006, 06:17 PM
Sure is funny how the democrats are getting blamed for any supposed merger when it is a fact that it is the Bush white house that is trying to slip all of this in under the radar without any congressional oversight. Maybe some of you might want to go back through the info in this thread and actually read it before you condemn people who are not even in power till Jan 1. Use a little common sense, who would be for this plan, democrats (unions, middle class) or republicans (big business, wealthy class).

Bravo.

I hope everyone slows down before they get on the Dems caused all this band wagon. Running a government is like steering a big giant ship. You turn the wheel and it takes time for the ship to adjust. The things GW are doing now will affect (infect) us for years to come. We wont see many of the affects for a while. Then everyone will be quick to blame the next pres.


Amero, Euro, GCC, pretty soon hundreds of countries with hundreds of currencies will be replaced by hundreds of countries with a few dozen currencies. Then mabey in my grandchildrens era one world currency.
This is very scary indeed. I cant do anything about this, and this forum cant probably do anything about this but if we all start to raise hell & talk to our elected officials then mabey ...we could idon't know, slow it down.
I takes the all mighty people of our great nation to 1: Be informed 2: do something.

tmorr37
12-01-2006, 06:35 PM
Don't you find it funny that nobody talks about it. Not dems not rep and not the Media. Total black out

Wooly
12-01-2006, 06:51 PM
One step closer to one world currency and one world order.... UH OH....

graciewacies
12-01-2006, 07:02 PM
Sure is funny how the democrats are getting blamed for any supposed merger when it is a fact that it is the Bush white house that is trying to slip all of this in under the radar without any congressional oversight. Maybe some of you might want to go back through the info in this thread and actually read it before you condemn people who are not even in power till Jan 1. Use a little common sense, who would be for this plan, democrats (unions, middle class) or republicans (big business, wealthy class).

Democrats for union, middle class (HA) don't you mean lazy unemployed welfare trash. Republicans are for everyone who are willing to work hard in life to get what they want. They believe that everyone is equal and we all get the same chances. I lived in the ghetto it was horrible because they are all cutthroat lazy bums who don't work because the democrats keep telling them that they are incapable of being like everyone else. Its so disgusting that people who are successful are considered evil. Stupid Stupid Stupid.:mad:
Sorry, I've been holding that in for a very long time
I feel much better now:)

BusterBrown
12-01-2006, 07:04 PM
That is scary....Amero... not what I would think as a good thing

I agree, and I think the minute man in your avatar would be going for the squirrel gun by the door over this. I can't see this taking place without a fair amount of social unrest. Who is going to have authority over us and how will that be determined? The only way this would work is if the current money system crashed and we were basically forced to accept it, just for an answer, to end the calamity that would befall us.

tmorr37
12-01-2006, 07:56 PM
I agree, and I think the minute man in your avatar would be going for the squirrel gun by the door over this. I can't see this taking place without a fair amount of social unrest. Who is going to have authority over us and how will that be determined? The only way this would work is if the current money system crashed and we were basically forced to accept it, just for an answer, to end the calamity that would befall us.

Such as oil producing nations that break the Americans monopoly on world currency and sell oil in a different currency. Iran has threated this. So did Iraq. Other nations would rush to dump their Holdings of US dollars. US economy destroyed in one swift move.

inquisitive
12-01-2006, 09:05 PM
[quote=tmorr37;252112]This is an on going situation of both dems and rep. Remember how Clinton started the NAFTA stuff. Probably started before that. I'm not sure I'm against it for national security reasons. If our enemies destroyed the US dollar this would be a way reprint and start a new America. Sure would play hell with china's stash of a trillion US dollars in there vault.
As for Mexico, well that is a lot of real estate to develop and there is hugh growth potential. They say it would go to the tip of south America.
Venezuela, Why do you think that has become a problem lately.
There are a lot of articles out there on this stuff. The Euro has worked out.[/quot

WoW! You ............need a hug......................

tmorr37
12-01-2006, 09:33 PM
So I see, You and your screen name have nothing in common

inquisitive :rolleye03

lglwzrd
12-01-2006, 09:44 PM
well, i heard it from reliable souses that they are going to lop 3 o's from the usd to curb inflation and bring our currency in line with the nid!!

tmorr37
12-01-2006, 09:46 PM
well, i heard it from reliable souses that they are going to lop 3 o's from the usd to curb inflation and bring our currency in line with the nid!!

yes ,as a result of the US Islamic war lose oil is now at 64000 USD or 64 IQD

Ialdoboath
12-02-2006, 02:06 AM
So the dollar is downsizing and the IQD is on the rise!



So it appears that we are going to be partnering with Canada and Mexico; they currency is less er of a value then the USD, makes you wonder what might be happening next to further reduce the USD for the United States of America?

Lowes announced to their management employee the "new" currency will be coming; did not think it was going to be that soon, but the end is near!

Or is it the end?


As a Canadian this scares the hell out to of me. While you are right our dollar is approx. 15 cents less than yours, we have no national debt to speak of, where the US is in the trillions... how do you equate that in a common currency?

peakoil
12-02-2006, 08:20 AM
As a Canadian this scares the hell out to of me. While you are right our dollar is approx. 15 cents less than yours, we have no national debt to speak of, where the US is in the trillions... how do you equate that in a common currency?

Things change quickly my Canadian friend. Just as fast as it took to get into debt, we could pull out of debt. Besides do not let these political matters make you lose focus on the true OWNERSHIP here. The Central Banks of your country AND our country are really under the same owners anyway. They are very smart and they have plans for us all.

BusterBrown
12-02-2006, 08:33 AM
Such as oil producing nations that break the Americans monopoly on world currency and sell oil in a different currency. Iran has threated this. So did Iraq. Other nations would rush to dump their Holdings of US dollars. US economy destroyed in one swift move.

It is the only way any 0f our enemies could stop the US. I actually look for this to happen. Again I say, this will not come about without a significant amount of social unrest.:no:

Dinar_OS
12-02-2006, 10:27 AM
The FX is the largest market in the world. What befalls the FX if all is equal. I know this is way out in the future, but will this be the demise of this market also?

Pimpmaximus
12-02-2006, 10:40 AM
Things change quickly my Canadian friend. Just as fast as it took to get into debt, we could pull out of debt. Besides do not let these political matters make you lose focus on the true OWNERSHIP here. The Central Banks of your country AND our country are really under the same owners anyway. They are very smart and they have plans for us all.


I would be most interested in your analysis of this statement.........

As you formulate your explanation, focus on the word COULD. I beleive this to be the sticking point in your argument.

Pimpmaximus
12-02-2006, 10:44 AM
It is the only way any 0f our enemies could stop the US. I actually look for this to happen. Again I say, this will not come about without a significant amount of social unrest.:no:


From a foreigners perspective, it would be a sound logical move to go away from the USD. Using a currency which is not overvalued and is debt-free is never a bad deal.

Problem for the US is the foreign nations view the dollar standard as a form of taxation. They pay for thier oil in USD, and we repay them by continuously decreasing the value of the dollar. For the standpoint of another nation is is nothing short of an imperial tax. More and more countries are waking up and seeing this. Not good news at all..............

Anaconda_Dinar_Sheik
12-02-2006, 11:04 AM
Don't you find it funny that nobody talks about it. Not dems not rep and not the Media. Total black out

I agree, its to quiet. If this were true, it would be all over the media....

Ialdoboath
12-02-2006, 11:14 AM
Don't you find it funny that nobody talks about it. Not dems not rep and not the Media. Total black out

Yeah... sounds to me like a Bramfman Group deal.


Thing is, the Canadian adn Mexican currency are owned by their respective governments. The American currency is not. Since the US privatized the federal reserve banks every American dollar is actually owned by a private company (or individual) who literally rent the money to the USA at a surcharge. This measn that as long as there is one USD in circulation the US is in debt for it, having to pay a charge to keep that bill in circulation.

I do not see how you can take 2 government mints (Canadian and Mexican) that create money federally and combine them with the US system wherein the mints (US Reserve banks) are private enterprises.

BusterBrown
12-02-2006, 12:11 PM
I agree, its to quiet. If this were true, it would be all over the media....

This information could not be common knowledge yet. What kind of an effect would this have on our economy right now if this hit the news wires. If this is really true, the only way it could be implimented is after a currency crash. Go tell this news to somone who bleeds red, white,and blue and see what kind of reaction you get. I'm sure you may here something like "over my dead body!". There are to many people out here who will view this as nothing short of our country being taken over by outside forces.:no:

tmorr37
12-03-2006, 09:27 AM
GOLD DINAR vs. US DOLLAR
Power’s Strategic and International Studies Blog » Blog Archive » GOLD DINAR vs. US DOLLAR (http://obelix.royalroads.ca/Powerblog/?p=80)

GOLD DINAR vs. US DOLLAR ‘Monetary Jihad’ will backfire IF Americans wise up “Gold Dinar” is the term for a fairly new development in international finance.

READ THIS ARTICLE (http://obelix.royalroads.ca/Powerblog/?p=80)

sgmunson
12-03-2006, 10:33 AM
Take a good read folks... If anyone out there with even 1 ounce of common sense believes even a fraction of what this website has to say, they are either grossly misinformed/uninformed or intentionally stupid. The "megawealthy" (i.e Rothchilds, Lloyds, Rockefellers, etc.) aren't about to allow any such thing to impinge on their wealth, and will squash such things long before they become a viable threat. Also, if you use your head and do a little math, you will soon realize that even if you could sieze every ounce of gold reserves everywhere in the world, that there isn't anywhere near enough to replace all the existing "debt-backed" wealth that exists... not even an incredibly small fraction of it. Gold is simply not a viable currency anymore because their just isn't enough of it. You would have to bankrupt most of the world's population just to feed one small country if you had to have gold backing just all the wealth in the Middle East. There just isn't enough... not even close.

Now stop and think about who benefits from such an article? Gold Dealers. They're getting greedy and want the price of gold even higher than it already is, so how do they create more demand? Simple... inject enough fear. 'Nuff said...

Steve
(aka sgmunson)
:lmao:


GOLD DINAR vs. US DOLLAR

Power’s Strategic and International Studies Blog » Blog Archive » GOLD DINAR vs. US DOLLAR (http://obelix.royalroads.ca/Powerblog/?p=80)

GOLD DINAR vs. US DOLLAR ‘Monetary Jihad’ will backfire IF Americans wise up “Gold Dinar” is the term for a fairly new development in international finance.


READ THIS ARTICLE
(http://obelix.royalroads.ca/Powerblog/?p=80)

peakoil
12-03-2006, 09:24 PM
I would be most interested in your analysis of this statement.........

As you formulate your explanation, focus on the word COULD. I beleive this to be the sticking point in your argument.

Could explains a "half full" or "half empty" glass.
Mine is always half full, and yours.:happy64:

peakoil
12-03-2006, 09:29 PM
Yeah... sounds to me like a Bramfman Group deal.


Thing is, the Canadian adn Mexican currency are owned by their respective governments. The American currency is not. Since the US privatized the federal reserve banks every American dollar is actually owned by a private company (or individual) who literally rent the money to the USA at a surcharge. This measn that as long as there is one USD in circulation the US is in debt for it, having to pay a charge to keep that bill in circulation.

I do not see how you can take 2 government mints (Canadian and Mexican) that create money federally and combine them with the US system wherein the mints (US Reserve banks) are private enterprises.

Who are you kidding. These bankers own it all. You and your country too!
Why do you think oil is traded in dollars and ALL central banks are stuffed full of USD's. Same as a check that I write you that just sits on your desk and you agree to NEVER cash it in.:happy64: