View Full Version : Republicans= Who would you voter for?
pokerfool
02-13-2007, 08:32 PM
Republicans= Who would you voter for?
Newt can't win.
Rice-Rice-Baby!
.....did I say that? Its been a long day.....
Wolverine
02-14-2007, 12:16 AM
I think John McCain wound up on the wrong poll, this IS the one asking who Republicans would vote for , isn't it ? :wave:
Sure Thing
02-14-2007, 04:34 AM
Republicans= Who would you voter for?
I'd vote for Tom Tancredo or Newt. They're the only Republican candidates that 'get it' when it comes to illegal immigration, preserving our national sovereignty and the need to secure our borders.
Most of the others are Liberal, RINO (Republicans In Name Only), pro-open borders, sell-out, one-worlders, as is George Bush.
Sure Thing
02-14-2007, 04:54 AM
Newt can't win.
Rice-Rice-Baby!
.....did I say that? Its been a long day.....
Republican voters went for Bush, 'because he could win' and we got $6 TRILLION dollars in new federal debt with more on the way.
Who knows how many TRILLION more his Liberal spending policies have driven state and local governments into?
We would have been better off with the gridlock a Republican congress and Democrat president would have given us and the possibility of a new Republican 'Contract with America' in response to Kerry's ultra-Liberalism.
We got another big-spending, pro-open borders, Liberal, Texan ala LBJ.
Bush has out-spent the most Liberal Democrat anyone can name.
No president in U.S. history has put our country deeper in debt!
If a fiscally and socially Conservative Republican can't win, we're better off with GRIDLOCK.
singledad/sflnative
02-14-2007, 06:18 AM
Newt? Wow! He was my choice. I thought that I would be the only one who would vote for him.
Maybe there is something there????????
Now there is something that makes you go Hmmmmmmmmmm! :wave:
justin082005
02-14-2007, 11:22 AM
I picked Romney in here.....I really don't know though. I like Giuliani a lot actually and couple times I talked with him liked him a lot. I also like McCain though.....yeah those last 2 sometimes I dont agree with on issues but also think they have better chance to win
BlueDinar
02-14-2007, 02:32 PM
Go Newt!!!!! He's the smartest and best qualified for the job! No one else compares....Hillary...yeah right put Billy back in the White house so he can watch Hillary and her assisstant do the nasty in the oval office.....what you don't think she would get him back for Monica? Newt or Obama...that's my choice.
rainsofterror
02-14-2007, 02:59 PM
The republicans really need McCain to be the president. Bush should thank his luck stars that the BCRA hadnt been implemented before 2000. We could have actually had a "wartime presidetn" for the last eight years
williambedloe
02-14-2007, 03:28 PM
Newt ...he won't win the nomination, but he should, if the conservative base has any brains
The reason he will not is because he does not have cross over appeal to independents and democrats
Shame...if he does not win, I like Rudy...he did great things with New York, proved his mettle in a major crisis
Whew...I'm tired of politicians...
BrerRabbit
02-14-2007, 04:09 PM
Newt or Ron Paul.
I'd like to see voting limited to taxpayers only. That way there would a vested interest in electing some people who would watch the money closer. Bush and the Repubs have shown they can't be trusted with the cookie jar any better then the Demos. Two flavors of the same socialist ice cream.
And we have got to close the damn border with Mexico.
graciewacies
02-14-2007, 06:32 PM
Newt is definately the best man for the job.....
but there is the problem..... man... women will vote for
Hillary just to put a woman in office.
Republicans and Democrats in Louisiana voted for that
idiot Blanco because it would make our state look good
to finally have a female governor.
They all put the issues aside and voted for the woman.
People are really stupid they will vote for Hillary because
she is a woman. That is why I think Rice has the best chance..
But I would love to see Newt in office..:wave::)
cowpoke
02-15-2007, 12:44 PM
I'd vote for Tom Tancredo or Newt. They're the only Republican candidates that 'get it' when it comes to illegal immigration, preserving our national sovereignty and the need to secure our borders.
Most of the others are Liberal, RINO (Republicans In Name Only), pro-open borders, sell-out, one-worlders, as is George Bush.
Sure Thing, You are kidding right? Michael Savage's mantra of borders language and culture trumps them all.
Michael is my long shot. Next, would be Newt, then Ron Paul (not necessarily in that order)
I like Newts Historical background(History Professor) and I like Ron Paul's Truth on the Federal Reserve.
Great Pole!
bagzz
02-15-2007, 07:21 PM
I'd vote for Tom Tancredo or Newt. They're the only Republican candidates that 'get it' when it comes to illegal immigration, preserving our national sovereignty and the need to secure our borders.
Most of the others are Liberal, RINO (Republicans In Name Only), pro-open borders, sell-out, one-worlders, as is George Bush.
:drunk: Even Michael Savage?:drunk:
Although I kinda don't think he'd go as a republican, what with the current quasi-socilist state of the grand old party.....
vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.