PDA

View Full Version : UN Hopes for "Grand Deal" to Resolve Iraq's Kirkuk



Seaview
08-21-2008, 12:42 PM
The United Nations will publish an analysis of territory disputes between Iraq's Kurds and other communities by October in a bid for a "grand deal" to end tension over Kirkuk, its Iraq mission chief said on Wednesday.

In a two-hour briefing to reporters, Staffan de Mistura gave one of his fullest accounts yet of the U.N.'s efforts to resolve a looming row without fresh bloodshed.

He said the U.N. would publish its report in September or October, outlining results of six months of field investigations into the history and make-up of some 30-40 parts of Iraq where local government is in dispute -- including the city of Kirkuk.

Instead of holding a referendum on the city's fate which would pit Arab and Turkmen residents against Kurds, the aim would be to negotiate a broad political deal which could then be put to a "confirmatory referendum", backed by all sides.

"We are pushing for a grand deal, looking at the whole area," de Mistura said.

"Our aim is to draw up options by October, which if all Iraqi parties work consistently on those, could provide a peaceful political solution which eventually may be confirmed or sanctioned through a confirmatory referendum."

Fifteen U.N. experts have been pouring over Iraqi archives and holding town meetings to draw up the report, which will analyze the merits of competing claims to govern disputed areas.

The bitterest differences are over Kirkuk, an oil-rich city in northern Iraq that Kurds claim as their ancestral homeland and want to incorporate into their autonomous region, a move fiercely opposed by Arab and Turkmen residents.

Kurds say many of the others were moved into the area under Saddam Hussein, the Sunni Arab dictator who planned to "Arabize" the region. Other groups say they fear the Kurds now want to drive them out.

ELECTIONS STALLED

The dispute has already stalled efforts to hold provincial elections throughout the country after parliament failed to pass an elections law because of divisions over Kirkuk this month.

Diplomats and Iraqi politicians fear the dispute could lead to a new outbreak of fighting between Arabs and Kurds, even as the sectarian violence between Shi'ites and Sunnis that ravaged Iraq over the past three years has begun to subside.

Iraq's constitution calls for a referendum on Kirkuk's fate, initially scheduled to take place at the end of last year. The United Nations helped persuade Kurdish leaders to postpone it.

"I told them it would have been totally counterproductive, and there could be a better solution if we have a political framework," de Mistura said.

The U.N. research team includes lawyers, academics and diplomats, producing what in effect will be the first history of the local administration of the disputed areas.

The team published their findings on the first four disputed districts in June, covering areas in neighboring provinces that are seen as less fiercely contested than Kirkuk itself.

"What is incredibly surprising in this whole exercise is what a mature and functioning bureaucracy Iraq has had throughout the whole of its contemporary history," said team leader Peter Bartu.

http://pukmedia.com/english/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=5970&Itemid=1

RU-SAVED
08-21-2008, 01:38 PM
Either KIRKUK IS or IS NOT a part of Iraq. It appears they want their OWN AUTONOMOUS separation and to rule their OWN laws with their OWN Prime Minister. Either they ARE a part of Iraq or they are not. Back in the 60's, JFK sent TROOPS into our own southern states in Alabama for Segregation and legal rights. I think the GOI needs to surround Kirkuk, and rule this city with authority, or else annex them to their OWN country, and let it be.

IraqiFreedom
08-21-2008, 02:16 PM
Either KIRKUK IS or IS NOT a part of Iraq. It appears they want their OWN AUTONOMOUS separation and to rule their OWN laws with their OWN Prime Minister. Either they ARE a part of Iraq or they are not. Back in the 60's, JFK sent TROOPS into our own southern states in Alabama for Segregation and legal rights. I think the GOI needs to surround Kirkuk, and rule this city with authority, or else annex them to their OWN country, and let it be.I don't have a solution to this issue, but I believe your example does not reflect the situation of Kirkuk. Iraq has regions, just like the US has states or Canada has provinces. There is no conflict in Kirkuk being part of one of Iraqs State like regions that has a degree of automomy.

Iraq has never defined which region Kirkuk will be part of, and this is what remains to be determined. It's not about the succession of the Kurdish state at this time, though it could move to that if the promises made to the Kurds in the Iraqi Constitution are not fullfilled. So this is an Iraqi Constitutional issue and not just the Kurds creating a new issue for independence.

I would argue that the Federal government in the US has used excessive power that has diminished the rights of states and led to much greater corruption in our own government. The use of troops, as in your example, is relegated to very special situations, and its legality is questionable under Posse Comitatus.

Howler
08-21-2008, 02:31 PM
Staffan de Mistura has been working his hind end off to resolve this.
He has the patience of a saint! I would have given up on them long ago.

RAIDER1
08-21-2008, 03:12 PM
Solution!

Make Kirkuk a US military Base till 2011 when we are suppose to be out of the country according to the US-Iraq agreement and divide the oil profits from the area till then.

This should provide stability in Kirkuk and give them time to figure out a deal.

HAHAHA

Howler
08-21-2008, 03:16 PM
Solution!

Make Kirkuk a US military Base till 2011 when we are suppose to be out of the country according to the US-Iraq agreement and divide the oil profits from the area till then.

This should provide stability in Kirkuk and give them time to figure out a deal.

HAHAHA



I like it!:clapping:

Bart
08-21-2008, 06:51 PM
Solution!

Make Kirkuk a US military Base till 2011 when we are suppose to be out of the country according to the US-Iraq agreement and divide the oil profits from the area till then.

This should provide stability in Kirkuk and give them time to figure out a deal.

HAHAHA

How about closing Bahgdad as the capitol and moving it to Kirkuk. Maybe make Kirkuk like DC in the states and the regions like states.

Nahhh, never happen