PDA

View Full Version : Google Chrome - 1st Web Based Browser


Lux
09-04-2008, 01:34 AM
http://www.computerworld.com/common/images/site/features/2008/092008/Chrome_header_778x150.jpg

All I can say is that this browser is incredibly fast.

http://www.google.com/chrome

Review: Google's Chrome -- the first true Web 2.0 browser

Google's new Chrome browser uses simplicity and some clever new features to bring Web surfing into the 21st century.

September 3, 2008 (Computerworld) Google (http://www.computerworld.com/action/inform.do?command=search&searchTerms=Google+Inc.)'s just-released Chrome takes the same approach to browser design that Google takes to its home page -- stripped-down, fast and functional, with very few bells and whistles.
That's both the good news and the bad news about this browser. Those who like a no-frills approach to their Web experience, and who want the content of Web sites front and center, will welcome it. But those who want a more fully featured interface with extras will prefer either Internet Explorer (http://www.computerworld.com/action/inform.do?command=search&searchTerms=Microsoft+Internet+Explorer) or Firefox (http://www.computerworld.com/action/inform.do?command=search&searchTerms=Mozilla+Firefox).
That said, keep in mind that this is a first beta, and Google may well introduce new features in future versions. For example, this version doesn't have a true bookmarks manager, but it would be quite surprising if one didn't show up in future betas.
In fact, there's a very long list of features this browser doesn't have. There's no built-in RSS reader, like there is in Internet Explorer or that's available as an add-on for Firefox. You won't find a good bookmarks manager, such as you'll find in both Internet Explorer and Firefox. There are no add-ons like those you'll find in Firefox. Be warned — the list of what's not there can go on for quite some time.
That was all by design, though, and it's why Google calls this browser Chrome. The user interface of a browser is called its chrome, and Google set out to reduce the chrome -- in other words, simplify the user interface -- as much as possible.
In a comic book (http://www.google.com/googlebooks/chrome/#) that gives technical background about the browser, Google explains its design philosophy this way: "We don't want to interrupt anything the user is trying to do. If you can just ignore the browser, we've done a good job."
If that was the goal, Google has succeeded. Chrome (http://www.computerworld.com/action/inform.do?command=search&searchTerms=Google+Chrome) has so little interface, the content area of the browser is larger than those of other browsers -- it almost feels like full-screen mode. Nothing gets in the way of the content of the browser window itself. In the same way that Google puts search front and center on its home page, this browser puts content first.

Designed for consumers or enterprises?

A great deal of what makes Chrome different from other browsers is not what you see, but what you don't see. Chrome appears to be designed in great part to run AJAX and Web 2.0 applications. It's the only browser that has been built from the ground up for a world in which the browser is a front end to Web-based applications and services like those that Google provides, and like those that are used increasingly by businesses.

To that end, Google has made dramatic changes under the hood. It has chosen the open-source WebKit as the rendering engine, and it built its own JavaScript virtual machine called V8 for running JavaScript faster, with more stability, and more securely. Each tab in Chrome runs as its own separate process, so if one tab is busy or bogged down, it won't affect the performance in other tabs. Google claims that designing a browser this way will also cut down on memory bloat.
Also important is that Chrome comes equipped with Google Gears (http://gears.google.com/), which is a kind of glue that ties together Web-based applications and your own hard disk.
The effect of all this should be — says Google — a browser able to run Web-based applications with the same speed, interactivity and stability as client-based applications. This means that Chrome may be aimed as much or more at Microsoft Office (http://blogs.computerworld.com/chrome_takes_dead_aim_at_windows_7_and_microsoft_o ffice) than it is at Internet Explorer. By providing a superior platform for running its Web-based applications, Google is giving itself a chance to supplant Office with Google Docs.
Seen in that way, the ultimate success of Chrome may be measured more by how many enterprises switch from Office to Google Docs than by how many consumers switch from IE to Chrome.

A look at the interface

All that being said, Chrome is, above all, a browser, and nothing would make Google happier than if the entire world switched to it. So the company has put a great deal of effort into rethinking the entire browser interface.
The Chrome interface looks different from any other browser you've seen. Tabs sit above the address bar instead of beneath it. There's no menu, no title bar and very few icons. In fact, there's not even a home page icon; look for it in vain. By default, it's turned off — to get one, you have to click the Tools icon, then choose Options --> Basics and check the box next to "Show Home button on the toolbar." Overall, it's as stripped-down a browser interface as you'll find.
To get to most browser functions and options, you use menus that drop down from two icons at the right-most portion of the browser — a page icon and a tools icon. But even there, this browser is stripped-down. For example, the Options menu is where you often find many hidden features, buried beneath multiple tabs. In Chrome, the Options menu (found under the Tools icon) offers only three tabs, none of which includes an overload of choices. You'll mainly find basics such as whether to display the home page icon, where to store your downloads and so on.

The address bar — what Google calls the Omnibox — is one of Chrome's nicer features. It doubles as a search bar: Type in your search terms, and it uses the search engine of your choice to do a search. When you instead type in a URL, it works much like the address bar in Internet Explorer 8 and Firefox 3: It lists suggested Web pages as you type, which it gathers from previously visited sites and your bookmarks, as well as making suggestions of its own based on Web site popularity.
When you visit a site, as with Internet Explorer 8, the address bar highlights the domain (such as www.computerworld.com (http://www.computerworld.com)) while the rest of the URL is lighter, so it's easy for you to determine at a glance which domain you are currently on, even if you're visiting a long URL.

read more

http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9114052

danny3793
09-04-2008, 01:52 AM
I'm currently browsing these forums using Chrome, it's very nice. I like the minimalistic interface, and the fact that each tab has it's own process, so that if one tab crashes, it doesn't crash the entire browser. I think Chrome can actually compete with FF and IE 8 easily, Google builds very nice applications, and I love their effort for Open Source, it's what we all need to start moving to.

Weston
09-04-2008, 01:58 AM
its to simple for me. maybe for someone who doesn't use the computer alot maybe but for me to simple not enough of my buttons that I like in Firefox

tmorr37
09-04-2008, 02:03 AM
I'll wait
Google is getting to big

tmorr37
09-04-2008, 02:36 AM
Review: Google Chrome lacks polish under the hood (http://apnews.myway.com//article/20080903/D92V15G80.html)

So which one comes out smelling like roses? The beta of Internet Explorer 8, released just last week.

When playing a YouTube video, Firefox 3 took up 95 percent of the CPU time on a three-year old laptop running Windows XP.

Chrome came in at 60 percent - still too much. Especially since Google owns YouTube! You'd think it could make its browser work well with that site in particular.

Internet Explorer barely broke a sweat, taking up just a few percent.

When I told each browser to load eight pages, some of which were heavy with Flash and graphics, Firefox took 17 seconds and ended with a continuous CPU load of 50 percent. That means it took up half of my available processing power, even if I wasn't looking at any of the pages.

Chrome loaded them the fastest, at 12 seconds, and ended with a CPU load of about 40 percent.

Internet Explorer 8 took 13 seconds to load, but ended with no CPU load at all.

So while Chrome's performance is a little better than that of Firefox, in practical terms, it is far less useful, because it lacks the broad array of third-party add-ons programs like Flashblock that make Firefox so customizable. With time, it might catch up, but in the meantime, I'd recommend giving the new Internet Explorer a spin.

danny3793
09-04-2008, 08:08 AM
Review: Google Chrome lacks polish under the hood (http://apnews.myway.com//article/20080903/D92V15G80.html)

So which one comes out smelling like roses? The beta of Internet Explorer 8, released just last week.

When playing a YouTube video, Firefox 3 took up 95 percent of the CPU time on a three-year old laptop running Windows XP.

Chrome came in at 60 percent - still too much. Especially since Google owns YouTube! You'd think it could make its browser work well with that site in particular.

Internet Explorer barely broke a sweat, taking up just a few percent.

When I told each browser to load eight pages, some of which were heavy with Flash and graphics, Firefox took 17 seconds and ended with a continuous CPU load of 50 percent. That means it took up half of my available processing power, even if I wasn't looking at any of the pages.

Chrome loaded them the fastest, at 12 seconds, and ended with a CPU load of about 40 percent.

Internet Explorer 8 took 13 seconds to load, but ended with no CPU load at all.

So while Chrome's performance is a little better than that of Firefox, in practical terms, it is far less useful, because it lacks the broad array of third-party add-ons programs like Flashblock that make Firefox so customizable. With time, it might catch up, but in the meantime, I'd recommend giving the new Internet Explorer a spin.




Testing Chrome on an older PC is not really testing the browser itself. Chrome creates separate processes for each tab, and is a lot more stable in that itself. If one tab crashes, your entire browser won't crash, and IE is very susceptible to freezing, which happens to me most of the time when I try to use it to ensure a script of mine is working on all browsers.

IE does run better on an older computer, I'm sure, but IE's load time for web pages is just flat out absurd, Chrome and FF load pages super fast, while IE is still sitting there waiting to finish reading the page. If you want to really use Chrome, or FF, you have to at least keep up with technology. I understand some can consider that a stretch, but every year technology pretty much doubles, so a three year old computer is pretty much a 6 year old computer, which isn't very powerful.

Also, as for having constant CPU load, it's probably because of how old the laptop is, I have no constant load what-so-ever on an AMD 4000+ x2 which runs at around 2.1Ghz with 2.0Ghz FSB, and this processor isn't a new addition to the AMD family either, I'd say it's about 2-3 years old, not my computer, but the processor 4000+ in general.

Weston
09-04-2008, 02:02 PM
Google Chrome EULA Claims Ownership of Everything You Create on Chrome, From Blog Posts to Emails (http://gizmodo.com/5044871/google-chrome-eula-claims-ownership-of-everything-you-create-using-chrome-from-blog-posts-to-emails)

Apprently there was a big back lash so they are changing their EULA claim and said it was a "mistake" hah


I dont trust google anymore especially when I heard Al Gore was on the board before google went public

danny3793
09-04-2008, 04:30 PM
Google Chrome EULA Claims Ownership of Everything You Create on Chrome, From Blog Posts to Emails (http://gizmodo.com/5044871/google-chrome-eula-claims-ownership-of-everything-you-create-using-chrome-from-blog-posts-to-emails)

Apprently there was a big back lash so they are changing their EULA claim and said it was a "mistake" hah


I dont trust google anymore especially when I heard Al Gore was on the board before google went public

You should have read the update:

http://gizmodo.com/5045050/google-updating-chrome-eula-to-be-less-creepy

Google is a lot better than a lot of other companies, such as Microsoft.

zimbu
09-04-2008, 08:17 PM
Chrome easter egg

paste this in the address bar and hit enter

about:internets

Zimmer

cowpoke
09-04-2008, 08:29 PM
Chrome easter egg

paste this in the address bar and hit enter

about:internets

Zimmer

:confused: My bible Thumpin Jesus Freak Conservative brain don't get it..
I see the windows screen saver pipes ect. And some geek speak but nothing else..
I have Vista, am I missing something here??:confused:

danny3793
09-04-2008, 08:34 PM
:confused: My bible Thumpin Jesus Freak Conservative brain don't get it..
I see the windows screen saver pipes ect. And some geek speak but nothing else..
I have Vista, am I missing something here??:confused:

Nope, that's what you're supposed to see.
There's also the following:

about:stats
about:memory
about:plugins
about:cache

there's more than that also, just don't want to grab the whole list, those are the ones off the top of my head.

shalimar
11-06-2009, 11:28 PM
hi,
yes yes sure google Chrome is the best browser, when i first downloaded it, my internet was running at a lighting speed, i even checked my speed ( http://www.ip-details.com/internet-speed-test/ ) and it was normal too, hitherto i used firefox which chocked my browsing capablilities

shalimar
11-06-2009, 11:29 PM
hi,
yes yes sure google Chrome is the best browser, when i first downloaded it, my internet was running at a lighting speed, i even checked my speed and it was normal too, hitherto i used firefox which chocked my browsing capablilities