+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 44

Thread: Next on Senate agenda? Pedophile Protection Act

  1. #1

    Default Next on Senate agenda? Pedophile Protection Act

    Next on Senate agenda? Pedophile Protection Act
    'Hate crimes' law definitions would protect 547 sex 'philias'

    Posted: May 04, 2009
    9:08 pm Eastern



    By Bob Unruh
    © 2009 WorldNetDaily
    The leader of a pro-family organization says families across the nation need to contact their U.S. senators now to try to derail a legislative plan that already has passed the U.S. House and is being awaited by President Obama – after a Democrat confirmed that it would protect "all 547 forms of sexual deviancy or 'paraphilias' listed by the American Psychiatric Association."
    WND columnist Janet Porter, who also heads the Faith2Action.org Christian ministry, today cited S. 909, dubbed the "Pedophile Protection Act" as an extreme danger to America.
    As H.R. 1913, the House version of the so-called "hate crimes" bill was adopted on a 149-175 vote, but not before several amendments were proposed by Republicans trying to mitigate the impact of the draconian law.

    Democratic Sens. Edward Kennedy and Patrick Leahy immediately introduced a matching plan in the U.S. Senate, and activists say a vote in committee could come as early as tomorrow.
    The proposal, formally called the Matthew Shepard Hate Crimes Prevention Act after a Wyoming homosexual who was killed in a horrific robbery and beating in 1998, creates a special class for homosexuals and others with alternative sexual lifestyles and provides them protections against so-called "hate."
    It specifically denies such protections to other targeted classes of citizens such as pastors, Christians, missionaries, veterans and the elderly.

    Wrote Porter, "I've written extensively about how this bill would criminalize Christianity and turn those who disagree with the homosexual agenda into felons, but criminalizing Christianity is just the beginning of what this bill would do. It would also elevate pedophiles as a special protected class – since the term 'sexual orientation' which has been added to the 'hate crimes' legislation includes them in the American Psychiatric Association's definition of various 'sexual orientations."
    Read the column warning against the dangers of Sen. Edward Kennedy's "hate crimes" plan.
    Porter cited the amendment offering from Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa, in committee that was very simple:
    The term sexual orientation as used in this act or any amendments to this act does not include pedophilia.
    But majority Democrats refused to accept that.
    Congressman Louis Gohmert, R-Texas, then explained what that means, Porter wrote.
    There are only 242 crimes where there is actually some – truly – an assault, and we just rejected an amendment to including pedophilia from being a part of this protected class. Do you realize what that means?

    If a mother hears that their child has been raped and she slaps the assailant with her purse, she is now gone after as a hate criminal because this is a protected class. There are other protected classes in here. I mean simple exhibitionism. I have female friends who have told me over the years that some guy flashed them, and their immediate reaction was to hit them with their purse. Well now, he's committed a misdemeanor, she has committed a federal hate crime because the exhibitionism is protected under sexual orientation.

    I know my friend said that we have a definition in the law, but there is nothing in this bill that references the definitions in the Hate Crimes Statistical Act…it's not there. We asked that it be added so we could get a specific definition. It is not there.

    And having reviewed cases as an appellate judge, I know that when the legislature has the chance to include a definition and refuses, then what we look at is the plain meaning of those words. The plain meaning of sexual orientation is anything to which someone is orientated. That could include exhibitionism, it could include necrophilia (sexual arousal/activity with a corpse) … it could include Urophilia (sexual arousal associated with urine), voyeurism. You see someone spying on you changing clothes and you hit them, they've committed a misdemeanor, you've committed a federal felony under this bill. It is so wrong.
    King, Porter wrote, also told the full U.S. House that the APA has a list of 547 different "paraphilias" that would be protected by members of Congress under the "hate crimes" plan.
    Find out how homosexuality as a "civil right" was sold to America, in the best-selling "Marketing of Evil."
    U.S. Rep. Alcee Hastings, D-Fla., a "hate crimes" supporter, agreed, saying:
    This bill addresses our resolve to end violence based on prejudice and to guarantee that all Americans regardless of race, color, religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability or all of these 'Philias' and fetishes and 'ism's' that were put forward need not live in fear because of who they are. I urge my colleagues to vote in favor of this rule…"
    Porter said families, parents, Americans, anyone interested in the future of the nation, needs to contact their members in the Senate and demand hearings, then demand a filibuster.
    "Pushing away an unwelcome advance of a homosexual, transgendered, cross-dresser or exhibitionist could make you a felon under this law. Speaking out against the homosexual agenda could also make you a felon if you are said to influence someone who pushes away that unwelcome advance. And pedophiles and other sexual deviants would enjoy an elevated level of protection while children, seniors, veterans, and churches would not," Porter said.
    The "hate crimes" proposal not only sets up criminal charges against those whose actions or words offend homosexuals but also provides money "to improve the education and training of local officials to identify, investigate, prosecute and <I>prevent</i> hate crimes."
    President Obama, supported strongly during his campaign by homosexual advocates, appears ready to respond to their desires.
    "I urge members on both sides of the aisle to act on this important civil rights issue by passing this legislation to protect all of our citizens from violent acts of intolerance," he said.
    Gary Cass of the Christian Anti-Defamation Commission said the Senate proposal could be voted on in committee as early as tomorrow.
    "You must call the Senate today and demand that they hold hearings on this bill," he wrote. "It is one of the most radical pieces of legislation to ever make its way to the Senate. If passed, it will lay the groundwork for restricting religious liberty and freedom of speech as it has in Canada and Europe."
    Similar state laws have resulted in persecution for Christians. In Philadelphia several years ago, a 73-year-old grandmother was jailed for trying to share Christian tracts with people at a homosexual festival.
    Rep. Virginia Foxx, R-N.C., said H.R. 1913 will create "thought crimes," and U.S. Rep. Trent Franks, R-Ariz., said it will end equality in the U.S.
    Gohmert warned the law will be used against pastors – or anyone else – who speaks against homosexuality or other alternative sexual lifestyle choices. He said it provides that anyone who through speech "induces" commission of a violent hate crime "will be tried as a principal" alongside the active offender.
    Critics say that would allow for prosecutions against pastors who preach a biblical ban on homosexuality if someone who hears such a message later is accused of any crime.
    Andrea Lafferty, executive director of the Traditional Values Coalition, said, "A pastor's sermon could be considered 'hate speech' under this legislation if heard by an individual who then acts aggressively against persons based on 'sexual orientation.' The pastor could be prosecuted for 'conspiracy to commit a hate crime'" she said.
    The bill previously failed when President Bush determined it was unnecessary – the crimes banned in the legislation already are addressed by other laws – and it probably is unconstitutional.
    "The federal hate crimes bill is bad news for everyone," said Brad Dacus of Pacific Justice Institute, who testified in Congress against the bill two years ago.
    Matt Barber of Liberty Counsel has spoken out against H.R. 1913 a number of times.
    "As has proved to be true in both Europe and Canada, this Orwellian piece of legislation is the direct precursor to freedom killing and speech chilling 'hate speech' laws. It represents a thinly veiled effort to ultimately silence – under penalty of law – morally, medically and biblically based opposition to the homosexual lifestyle," he said.
    Click here to obtain the information to contact your senator.



    http://victorylaneauctions.com/
    7% Seller's Fee No Listing Fee's.
    Obama
    /Biden in 2012 Just Say NO.

  2. #2

    Default

    Luckily we already have laws protecting pedophile prey...

    Propaganda spin coming from the conservative christians... I guess I should have a problem with a piece of legislature limiting the options bigots have in harassing/doing harm to people that are different.



    Semper Fi

    "Before the Boogeyman goes to bed at night..... He checks his closet for Chuck Norris."

  3. #3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Semper Fidelis View Post
    Luckily we already have laws protecting pedophile prey...

    Propaganda spin coming from the conservative christians... I guess I should have a problem with a piece of legislature limiting the options bigots have in harassing/doing harm to people that are different.
    More "insight" from the sheep...

    edit: oops - had to put "insight" in quotes to indicate sarcasm



    "Here richly, with ridiculous display, the politician's corpse was laid away. While all of his acquaintance sneered and slanged, I wept; for I had longed to see him hanged." Hilaire Belloc, Epitaph on the Politician Himself

  4. #4

    Default

    Anyone who preys on innocent children should be put to death immediately. I would be happy to do the job. Anyone who would take up for a pedophile really has a severe mental problem. There is none so innocent as a child. JMO.




  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    The best part of town, (outside of it)
    Posts
    11,099

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ringworm View Post
    Anyone who preys on innocent children should be put to death immediately. I would be happy to do the job. Anyone who would take up for a pedophile really has a severe mental problem. There is none so innocent as a child. JMO.

    What about the 13 year olds punks who threaten the 12 year old girl for whatever reason? There was an ugly situation in my hometown (not a downtown slum by any means), which probably occurs 1000 times per day all over the nation. When do you start shooting 13-16 year old malfunctioning teen punks?

    Also, when did you first get laid? If you were around 16 (the national average), and the girl was under 18 (well above the national average) then you were in fact, by law (in most states).. a pedophile.

    Too many mixed messages in regard to youth and sex.


    http://www.dailycamera.com/news/2009/may/01/police-boulder-teens-threatened-rape-girl-because-/

    *and yes if this incident happened to my daughter Id currently be posting on the IIF from prison, at the very least for charges of assault and battery on a minor..



    Bush sucked, Obama sucks... Ron Paul 2012

  6. #6

    Default

    I'm talking about adults. I hope your child is not one who is preyed upon, or any others.




  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    The best part of town, (outside of it)
    Posts
    11,099

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ringworm View Post
    I'm talking about adults. I hope your child is not one who is preyed upon, or any others.
    IMO all kids are preyed upon by some freak, or groups of deranged punks, which is unfortunately the nature of the repressed and sociopathic society we live in. That's why we have gotten our kids involved in martial arts from early on.



    Bush sucked, Obama sucks... Ron Paul 2012

  8. #8

    Default

    Yes you almost got the last word again. Picture martial arts from a 9 year old trying to stop a 250 pound mentally deranged pedophile. That's like watching the disney channel with super heroes taking care of business. Barney Frank comes to mind, but not sure about his weight or preference. For sure, he likes big or small boys. He has a sexual preference and also is a thief. I would not put it past him (liking little boys) since he is trying to find studs and steal every cent the taxpayers have in the U.S. Him and B.O. If you don't know who B.O. is , look up the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES. Good luck with martial arts.




  9. #9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by williambedloe View Post
    More "insight" from the sheep...

    edit: oops - had to put "insight" in quotes to indicate sarcasm
    It's easy to put down an opinion without expressing your own... What's up with the trolling lately?

    Do we not have laws protecting our children from pedophiles? While I really don't think we need a special classification for crimes committed against "different" people. I think calling this a "pedophile protection act" is a deliberate attempt by "WND columnist Janet Porter, who also heads the Faith2Action.org Christian ministry" to mislead as many as possible about what this bill is about. It's just another attempt by the religious right to influence lawmakers into voting against any and all things gay.

    IMO that's just bigoted propaganda.



    Semper Fi

    "Before the Boogeyman goes to bed at night..... He checks his closet for Chuck Norris."

  10. #10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ringworm View Post
    Yes you almost got the last word again. Picture martial arts from a 9 year old trying to stop a 250 pound mentally deranged pedophile. That's like watching the disney channel with super heroes taking care of business. Barney Frank comes to mind, but not sure about his weight or preference. For sure, he likes big or small boys. He has a sexual preference and also is a thief. I would not put it past him (liking little boys) since he is trying to find studs and steal every cent the taxpayers have in the U.S. Him and B.O. If you don't know who B.O. is , look up the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES. Good luck with martial arts.

    That's what parents are for...

    Who lets their 9 year old get into a vulnerable situation like that... other than Catholics?... I'd say 14 to 15 before I'd let my son go anywhere without me, and my daughter forget it... She's gonna have "Big Brother" keeping an eye on her till she graduates. Neither will be helpless against physical attack. You get a 15 year old boy with 10 years experience in Tae Kwon Do or Jujitsu and you've got a dangerous kid. Luckily daddy was a MCMAP instructor...
    Last edited by Semper Fidelis; 05-06-2009 at 07:02 PM.



    Semper Fi

    "Before the Boogeyman goes to bed at night..... He checks his closet for Chuck Norris."

  11. #11

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Semper Fidelis View Post
    It's easy to put down an opinion without expressing your own... What's up with the trolling lately?

    Do we not have laws protecting our children from pedophiles? While I really don't think we need a special classification for crimes committed against "different" people. I think calling this a "pedophile protection act" is a deliberate attempt by "WND columnist Janet Porter, who also heads the Faith2Action.org Christian ministry" to mislead as many as possible about what this bill is about. It's just another attempt by the religious right to influence lawmakers into voting against any and all things gay.

    IMO that's just bigoted propaganda.
    Again - you don't see why you too are falling quickly into your own "sheeple" trap do you?

    The same venom you proclaim conservative Christians have for gays is on full display by gays and others (like you) against Christians on a daily basis...only difference is that there is no Federal Hate Crimes legislation protecting Christians specifically, nor will they likely introduce legislation anytime soon.

    Christian bashing is in vogue now - just look at your own posts - and by a crowd that does not see its own hypocrisy in this matter. You call sheep those that bash gays and push a conservative agenda, while joining in the Christian bashing chorus yourself. Do you not see it?


    In summary, bigoted propaganda goes both ways...



    "Here richly, with ridiculous display, the politician's corpse was laid away. While all of his acquaintance sneered and slanged, I wept; for I had longed to see him hanged." Hilaire Belloc, Epitaph on the Politician Himself

  12. #12

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Semper Fidelis View Post
    That's what parents are for...

    Who lets their 9 year old get into a vulnerable situation like that... other than Catholics?... I'd say 14 to 15 before I'd let my son go anywhere without me, and my daughter forget it... She's gonna have "Big Brother" keeping an eye on her till she graduates. Neither will be helpless against physical attack. You get a 15 year old boy with 10 years experience in Tae Kwon Do or Jujitsu and you've got a dangerous kid. Luckily daddy was a MCMAP instructor...
    What happens to the 14 year old with 9 years experience. I am retired from the military and have learned a little about self defense.. If there is a kid out there who knows martial arts and he has to overcome an extra 100 pounds, I would question whether or not he or SHE could handle it . I am finished with this discussion. Any fat homosexuals who like little kids, rhyme in! Next post will probably be from one! Post if you want to. I am predujice against people like Barney Frank, admitted homo, who is in charge of the banking sector under B.O, In fact B.O. is probably his boyfriend.




  13. #13

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ringworm View Post
    What happens to the 14 year old with 9 years experience. I am retired from the military and have learned a little about self defense.. If there is a kid out there who knows martial arts and he has to overcome an extra 100 pounds, I would question whether or not he or SHE could handle it . I am finished with this discussion. Any fat homosexuals who like little kids, rhyme in! Next post will probably be from one! Post if you want to. I am predujice against people like Barney Frank, admitted homo, who is in charge of the banking sector under B.O, In fact B.O. is probably his boyfriend.

    Wait.... You're prejudiced.... I would have never guessed.

    You see William... they always have an audience. It's not all of Christianity that I go out bashing... Just segments like this... and the Christian right wouldn't have to endure the bashing if they'd just leave the rest of the world to make decisions for itself.. I don't have gay people coming to my door pushing homosexuality on me... I've got christian friends, I've got gay friends... My gay friends aren't insisting I need to join Gaydom or go to hell...
    Nobody designated Christianity a moral compass to follow... Given the history of any religion, that idea is a joke. I understand every group has its ideals... But Christianity's are no more important in this country than smaller segments of the population... The goofy stuff they believe in is their deal... When they start worrying about the goofy stuff I believe in, they should be put in their place... That's my problem with Christianity, or should I say, the average self-righteous christian...



    Semper Fi

    "Before the Boogeyman goes to bed at night..... He checks his closet for Chuck Norris."

  14. #14

    Default

    DH / Have you had a lobotomy lately?




  15. #15

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Semper Fidelis View Post
    I don't have gay people coming to my door pushing homosexuality on me... I've got christian friends, I've got gay friends... My gay friends aren't insisting I need to join Gaydom or go to hell..
    Really? You must be living in a pretty rural and heavily Christian area, because we have gay people forcing their agenda in schools, where I don't want my children to hear about it, and on television and in print. We are being bashed over the head with "gaydom" as you refer to it on a daily basis.



    "Here richly, with ridiculous display, the politician's corpse was laid away. While all of his acquaintance sneered and slanged, I wept; for I had longed to see him hanged." Hilaire Belloc, Epitaph on the Politician Himself

  16. #16

    Default

    The truth is, if you are gay or (queer is the word I learned when I was a kid), don't influence or try to have sex with children. If you do that and I find out, you or me will be dead. That is all there is to say about that. Pedophiles are criminals if they are adults. Children are innocent.




  17. #17
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Williamsburg, Virginia
    Posts
    1,869

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Semper Fidelis View Post
    I don't have gay people coming to my door pushing homosexuality on me...

    I doubt you could realize what is happening around you, even if you opened your door to look.....The forced indoctrination of our youth, against the wishes of their parents, marches on. But the sheeple have no clue.....


    'Gay' day coming to California public schools?
    Lawmakers vote to make children honor Harvey Milk – without parent consent


    May 06, 2009
    By Chelsea Schilling
    WorldNetDaliy.com




    Homosexual former San Francisco leader Harvey Milk


    SACRAMENTO – A California committee passed a bill proclaiming that the state's public school children will take a break from learning every year to celebrate Harvey Milk – a homosexual icon considered by some to be "a martyr for gay rights."

    The California State Senate Education Committee passed SB 572 today on a 7-2 vote. The bill encourages all California public schools to "conduct suitable commemorative exercises … remembering the life of Harvey Milk and recognizing his accomplishments as well as the contributions he made to this state."

    It requires no parental consent for student participation.

    SB 572 states, "Perhaps more than any other modern figure, Harvey Milk's life and political career embody the rise of the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) civil rights movement in California, across the nation, and throughout the world."

    "If signed into law, SB 572 will mean an official day commemorating homosexuality, bisexuality, and transsexuality in California government schools, without parental permission," said Randy Thomasson, president of SaveCalifornia.com, which has been generating citizen phone calls and e-mails against SB 572.

    "It's absurd that government schools teach children not to smoke or use drugs, yet would teach children as young as kindergarten that homosexuality is good and healthy and maybe even for them. That's just not true. Homosexual and bisexual behavior causes up to 82 percent of all HIV transmissions in California," Thomasson said.

    As WND reported last year, the same bill (numbered AB 2567) passed the Democrat-controlled Legislature, but was vetoed by Gov. Schwarzenegger.

    A SurveyUSA poll recently found that only one out of five Californians support making Milk's birthday a statewide "day of significance."

    Nonetheless, state legislators are still fighting for a yearly commemoration dubbed "Harvey Milk Day." The following lawmakers voted to establish Harvey Milk Day in California public schools:

    Sen. Abel Maldonado, R-Santa Maria
    Sen. Gloria Romero, D-East Los Angeles
    Sen. Elaine Alquist, D-San Jose
    Sen. Loni Hancock, D-Alameda County
    Sen. Carol Liu, D-Pasadena
    Sen. Alex Padilla, D-San Fernando Valley
    Sen. Joe Simitian, D-Palo Alto


    Voting against SB 572 were two Republican state senators: Bob Huff of Glendora and Mark Wyland of Carlsbad.

    The text of the bill states, "It is the intent of the Legislature that the exercises … be integrated into the regular school program, and be conducted by the school or institution within the amount otherwise budgeted for educational programs."

    The announcement comes only days after WND reported a California school district launched a website to "meet the needs of gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender and questioning youth."

    Thomasson said SB 572 is just one more reason why parents should rescue their children from the "anti-family" public school system. He encourages parents to visit RescueYourChild.org to learn about other education options before it's too late.

    "With public schools becoming sexual indoctrination centers, homeschooling and church schools are no longer parental options, they're parental imperatives," he said.

    Thomasson warned that the bill would impact children as young as 5 years old and positively portray homosexuality, bisexuality, and transsexuality and anything else that's "in the closet."





    This follows the October 'field trip', of a first grade class in California, to witness a homosexual marriage:

    In the same week that the No on 8 campaign launched an ad that labeled as “lies” claims that same-sex marriage would be taught in schools to young children, a first grade class took a school-sponsored trip to a gay wedding. Eighteen first graders traveled to San Francisco City Hall Friday for the wedding of their teacher and her lesbian partner, The San Francisco Chronicle reported. The school sponsored the trip for the students, ages 5 and 6, taking them away from their studies for the same-sex wedding. According to the Yes on 8 campaign, the public school field trip demonstrates that the California Supreme Court’s decision to legalize same-sex marriage has real consequences.

    “Taking children out of school for a same-sex wedding is not customary education. This is promoting same-sex marriage and indoctrinating young kids,” said Yes on 8—ProtectMarriage.com Campaign Co-Manager Frank Schubert. “I doubt the school has ever taken kids on a field trip to a traditional wedding,” Schubert said.

    When asked by the Yes on 8 campaign, The San Francisco Chronicle reporter said she did not know if the school had ever sponsored a field trip for students to a traditional wedding. Telling the Chronicle that the field trip was “a teachable moment,” the school’s principal believes it is perfectly appropriate for first graders to attend a same-sex wedding. Officials in other school districts disagree.

    “Prop. 8 protects our children from being taught in public schools that ’same-sex marriage’ is the same as traditional marriage,” said Santa Ana Unified School District board member Rosemarie “Rosie” Avila. “We should not accept a court decision that results in public schools teaching our kids that gay marriage is okay. That is an issue for parents to discuss with their children according to their own values and beliefs. It shouldn’t be forced on us against our will,” Avila added.

    The lesbian teacher’s wedding was officiated by San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom. Newsom is featured in a Yes on 8 television ad, released last week, in which he arrogantly declares of same-sex marriage: “The door’s wide open now. It’s gonna happen, whether you like it or not.”
    The Yes on 8 campaign’s ads explain that if the voters do not overturn the California Supreme Court’s same-sex marriage ruling, teachers will be required to teach young children that there is no difference between gay marriage and traditional marriage. “It’s totally unreasonable that a first grade field trip would be to a same-sex wedding,” said Chip White, Press Secretary for Yes on 8. “This is overt indoctrination of children who are too young to understand it.” The field trip underscores the Yes on 8 campaign’s message that unless Prop. 8 passes, children will be taught about same-sex marriage in public schools. “Not only can it happen, it has already happened,” White said.



    .



    "Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought"......John F. Kennedy

    "I would rather die on the hill of Integrity, than live in the valley of Compromise".....anonymous

    "Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery".......Winston Churchill

  18. #18

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dinarhunter View Post
    Wow who writes that garbage?? Teaching kids history is indoctrinating them into the Homosexual lifestyle?? I hope they never learn of the FBI or J. Edger Hoover because that will force them to be Cross dressers....or about WWII as they may all become Neo-Nazi's

    It is completely rediculous to ban children from learning about ANY significant Historical Figure or event...Like gay marriage or Harvey Milk...the next step is Burning Books...I feel ashamed for even reading that Garbage!
    Nice - hiding behind the old "it's history" gambit? What a joke....I suppose then that we learn about serial killers in school - maybe a course on how they killed (after all, it happened, and we should learn about it...right?)

    (and now - for those who completely miss the point - the chorus of "How can you equate gays to serial killers?" outrage begins...now!)

    The problem is that there are people actively trying to ensure the name Jesus never makes it into a lesson plan in school, while at the same time ensuring that "Gay Day" happens to let children know gays exist (really, they do?)

    Gay day at school is somehow important, but Jesus day would be instantly banned...get the picture now? Indoctrination is alive and well. Only problem is that the government is pushing one agenda while repressing another.



    "Here richly, with ridiculous display, the politician's corpse was laid away. While all of his acquaintance sneered and slanged, I wept; for I had longed to see him hanged." Hilaire Belloc, Epitaph on the Politician Himself

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Fm New Orleans
    Posts
    1,779

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dinarhunter View Post
    Wow who writes that garbage?? Teaching kids history is indoctrinating them into the Homosexual lifestyle?? I hope they never learn of the FBI or J. Edger Hoover because that will force them to be Cross dressers....or about WWII as they may all become Neo-Nazi's

    It is completely rediculous to ban children from learning about ANY significant Historical Figure or event...Like gay marriage or Harvey Milk...the next step is Burning Books...I feel ashamed for even reading that Garbage!


    I have come to the conclusion that liberals really are ignorant and have no logical thought processing. Look at it logically. Harvey Milk, what is so historical about him, because he fought for gay rights. OK, but yet they don’t let schools teach anything about Jesus. He did exist historically; there are numerous writing about him not only in the Bible, but the Dead Sea Scrolls, so why can’t he be taught in schools. He is a historical figure also and tried to make the world a better place for everyone to live in. That’s right Jesus wasn’t gay that’s why? Wait, the Constitution is a historical document, but schools don’t teach anything about that; wait Geography, Oh that’s another one they don’t teach, and the list goes on, but liberals are worried that our kids need to learn about Harvey Milk, instead of knowing the capitals of our states, and that other countries do exist. Well we all know what Harvey was milking, and it just isn’t that important. It has no value to help them scholastically or help them to get a good paying job. They worry why kids in North Korea or smarter and their grade point average for exceeds our kids in Science, Math, and other areas. Maybe because they aren’t wasting their time learning about a Harvey Milk getting milk up his .



    Hey did you see that? That squirrel just gave me the finger!!!!

  20. #20

    Cool Check Out...



    Quote Originally Posted by Dinarhunter View Post
    Wow who writes that garbage?? Teaching kids history is indoctrinating them into the Homosexual lifestyle?? I hope they never learn of the FBI or J. Edger Hoover because that will force them to be Cross dressers....or about WWII as they may all become Neo-Nazi's

    It is completely rediculous to ban children from learning about ANY significant Historical Figure or event...Like gay marriage or Harvey Milk...the next step is Burning Books...I feel ashamed for even reading that Garbage!
    My thread "For The Record"...




+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts