Why did the US go into Iraq? Why did non-military companies fill support roles in the conflict despite the military having the required people on the ground to do the job? Who owns the CBI?
I'm not here to hold peoples hand, and walk them through this. I would hate to be accussed by the whale of making people go broke. I've provided more than enough info for people to google themselves(look at KBR, Blackwater/Eric Prince, Rothschild, CACI, Titan and many others), keep in mind the normal common sense approach has not been used in this conflict, follow the money trail from these companies. You will notice they didn't mind pouring money into the Republican Party.
Iraq has been and will be nothing more than a cash cow for governments, companies, and people that have an investment in the country.
'Give me control of a nation's money and I care not who makes it's laws.'
- Mayer Amschel Bauer Rothschild
Gold is a fiat currency, just ask an expert on here
Further more I have no doubt most of these companies would fund either party so long as they get what they want.
Gold is a fiat currency, just ask an expert on here
Section two-- Capital Reserves and net Profits
Article 5 Capital Reservers.
1 The authorized capital of the CBI shall be 100 billion dinar and shall fully be paid in by the state in exchange for 100 percent of the CBI's Capital stock.
2 The authorized capital stock of the CBI shall held solely by the State, shall not pay a dividend, and shall not be transferable or subject to encumbrance."
Thats clear enough for me however maybe you can produce proof of ownership transferred to the Rothschilds although I would doubt the would consider a bank that pays no dividends and any profits are in reserve for the state. How much did the Rothschilds pay for this non transferable state owned bank?
http://www.cbi.iq/index.php?pid=LawsRegulations CBI Law
Sarkozy seeks US backing to reform monetary system
By Ben Hall and Peggy Hollinger in Paris
Published: January 9 2011 23:36 | Last updated: January 9 2011 23:36
Nicolas Sarkozy, the French president, arrives in Washington today in an attempt to win President Barack Obama’s support for his plans to launch an overhaul of the international monetary system during France’s presidency of the G20 group of nations, write Ben Hall and Peggy Hollinger in Paris.
Top of the list will be Mr Sarkozy’s campaign to convince the US that it should take part in talks on reducing currency volatility. Unfortunately this could also mean reducing the dollar’s role as the world’s reserve currency, which may make his task a difficult one.
When Mr Sarkozy called at the World Economic Forum in Davos in January 2010 for a new Bretton Woods system to stabilise global exchanges, he was mocked by some commentators for being hopelessly grandiose.
He left officials in France’s finance ministry puzzled as to how to fulfil such ambitions – or at least allow him to draw sufficient political credit for the exercise ahead of the 2012 presidential election.
Given international tensions over US monetary policy and intervention by some emerging economies to curb currency appreciation, Mr Sarkozy and his advisers feel vindicated for having to put reform of the international monetary system at the top of his agenda.
French officials were last week insisting that Mr Sarkozy was not travelling to the US with any firm proposals. “This is not about presenting propositions and asking if they will agree or not,” said one presidential adviser. “This is not about reducing the role of the dollar. In our view, it is right that the dollar continues to play a central role.”
However, there was room for discussion on whether the volatility that has beset currency exchanges could be reduced by encouraging the development of other reserve currencies. “One answer [to the tensions in the monetary system] could be more multilateralism”, the official said. “The rapport de force between different currencies will change. It is not about what we want for the future but how do we assure the transformation.”
At a two-day symposium in Paris last week Christine Lagarde, finance minister, reiterated the softly-softly approach. “Without defending or questioning the role of any specific currency, we can see that new economies have come to the fore during this recent crisis, and yet we have a world which for the time being is a single-currency world,” she said. “We need reserves that are surer and more stable.”
However, it may not be easy to get results. In recent months Paris has been forced to scale back its initial ambitions for a global overhaul and Mr Sarkozy will recalibrate his message at a press conference devoted to the G20 at the Elysée palace later in January.
Speaking to international policymakers and leading economists in Paris in December, Ms Lagarde made it clear France did not advocate some form of return to fixed exchange rates. The current system has “served us reasonably well”, she said.
She summed up the inadequacies of the current system as its failure to fix or stabilise growth imbalances, erratic capitals flows that endangered emerging economies, microeconomic inefficiencies and a growing propensity to “accelerated contagion”.
Ms Lagarde also gave some clues as to possible solutions. Paris believes that one realistic objective would be to secure G20 agreement on a sort of rule book for capital controls, allowing emerging economies to take measures against destabilising capital flows subject to agreed conditions and international co-ordination.
Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2011. You may share using our article tools. Please don't cut articles from FT.com and redistribute by email or post to the web.
One more thing, ever notice how history tends to repeat itself. That would mean some people would have to look back, however considering the members on here with blinkers on don't bother turning your necks.
Gold is a fiat currency, just ask an expert on here
A day without laughter is a day wasted: Charlie Chaplin.
NO RV TODAY! MAYBE TOMMOROW!
This will be my first and last post on this subject. There are many cockroachs. The trash is on both sides of the isle.
9/11 and the wars were due to the bungeled policies of a Democrat president.
Bill Clinton had Osama in Sudan and went against the advise of his military advisors.
-What the liberal media, CNN, CBS, ABC, NBC, MSNBC won’t tell you:
* Democrats fought to expand slavery while Republicans fought to end it. Lincoln the republican started a civil war to emancipate blacks.
* Democrats passed those discriminatory Black Codes and Jim Crow laws.
* Democrats fought against anti-lynching laws.
* Democrats fought to keep blacks in slavery and away from the polls, and they started the Ku Klux Klan to terrorize them.
* Democrat Senator Robert Byrd of West Virginia, is well known for having been a "Keagle" in the Ku Klux Klan.
* Democrat Senator Robert Byrd of West Virginia, personally filibustered the Civil Rights Act of 1964 for 14 straight hours to keep it from passage.
* Democrats passed the Repeal Act of 1894 that overturned civil right laws enacted by Republicans.
* Democrats declared that they would rather vote for a “yellow dog” than vote for a Republican, because the Republican Party was known as the party for blacks.
* Democrat President Woodrow Wilson, reintroduced segregation throughout the federal government immediately upon taking office in 1913.
* Democrat President Franklin D. Roosevelt's first appointment to the Supreme Court was a life member of the Ku Klux Klan, Sen. Hugo Black, Democrat of Alabama.
* Democrat President Franklin D. Roosevelt's choice for vice president in 1944 was Harry Truman, who had joined the Ku Klux Klan in Kansas City in 1922.
* Democrat President Franklin D. Roosevelt resisted Republican efforts to pass a federal law against lynching.
* Democrat President Franklin D. Roosevelt opposed integration of the armed forces.
* Democrat Senators Sam Ervin, Albert Gore, Sr. and Robert Byrd were the chief opponents of the 1964 Civil Rights Act.
* Democrat public safety commissioner Eugene "Bull" Connor, in Birmingham, Ala., unleashed vicious dogs and turned fire hoses on black civil rights demonstrators.
* Democrats were who Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. and the other protestors were fighting.
* Democrat Georgia Governor Lester Maddox "brandished an ax hammer to prevent blacks from patronizing his restaurant.
* Democrat Governor George Wallace stood in front of the Alabama schoolhouse in 1963, declaring there would be segregation forever.
* Democrat Arkansas Governor Faubus tried to prevent desegregation of Little Rock public schools.
* Democrat Senator John F. Kennedy voted against the 1957 Civil rights Act.
* Democrat President John F. Kennedy opposed the 1963 March on Washington by Dr. King.
* Democrat President John F. Kennedy, had Dr. King wiretapped and investigated by the FBI.
* Democrat President Bill Clinton's mentor was U.S. Senator J. William Fulbright, an Arkansas Democrat and a supporter of racial segregation.
* Democrat President Bill Clinton interned for J. William Fulbright in 1966-67.
* Democrat Senator J. William Fulbright signed the Southern Manifesto opposing the Supreme Court's 1954 Brown vs. Board of Education decision.
* Democrat Senator J. William Fulbright joined with the Dixiecrats in filibustering the Civil Rights Acts of 1957 and 1964.
* Democrat Senator J. William Fulbright voted against the 1965 Voting Rights Act.
Regarding the Republican Party, historians report that while Democrats were busy passing laws to hurt blacks, Republicans devoted their time to passing laws to help blacks. Republican President Reagan is the one that made Martin Luther King birthday a national holiday.
With all of those facts, democrats with the help of corrupt leftist media manage to deceive blacks and made them vote democrat blindly.
Sorry to jack this thread. Delete away admin.
"Bankers own the Earth, Take it away from them but leave them the power to create money and control credit and with the flick of a pen they will create enough to buy it back"- Sir Josiah Stamp former President Bank of England.
Adoption is a reason to be Thankful.
Normally, I just browse through these forums to see what people have to say about the RV and do not normally post. That being said your informative reply shocked me, its not often you find someone who actually does the research to back up the platform for which they stand. I applaud you for that.
Heck of a post OPP !
Sorry not Dinar related but...... could you check out what I posted below....
Sometimes, when you cry...no one sees your tears.
Sometimes, when you worry...no one sees your pain.
Sometimes, when you're happy...no one sees you smile.
But fart just ONE TIME.…
Hu's on first, HU'S on second and hU's on third? Hu's on D.C.
Hey smart people? A friend sent me this link that has a confrence call download. Its about G20 changing globle currency's in the next 24-48 hours. I guess if its true information this will be huge news? or it might be pumpers and scammers? I don't know?
It has to do with IMF releasing 47 trillion fund to over 140 different countries, and revaluing the all the worlds currencys? Im not going to take take the time to try a figure this out? But maybe one of you smarter members may want to tackle it? let us know what you think?
I think it close to an hour long?