Good article but not favoring a rv
Electronic copy available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1347407
THE NATIONAL CURRENCY RE-DENOMINATION EXPERIENCE
IN SEVERAL COUNTRIES – A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
Duca Ioana, Lecturer, Titu Maiorescu University Bucharest
ABSTRACT
This study covers a highly stringent subject for Romania nowadays – the re-denomination of national
currency. The introduction of the “hard” Leu is the most important monetary measure within the last 50 years. The
new banknotes and coins will be the last Romanian money, as starting 2012, Romania will switch to EURO. The redenomination
is a technical procedure of reducing the nominal value of the cash ensigns, which was implemented
already by around 50 countries as part of an economic reform. The re-denomination does not change the substance
of national currency, but it is important due to its psychological impact, both nationally and internationally. We will
try to present the long term and short term benefits, the reasons for choosing the timing of the re-denomination, the
technical aspects, the influence on the prices and the way in which the new currency was received. Since the redenomination
was most recently implemented in Romania and Turkey, we will focus on these cases.
Re-denomination represents the action of decreasing
the monetary value of cash ensigns, action implemented
during the last 85 years by approximately 50 countries
(Romania included), as part of a complex strategy of
economic reform.
The first country that went for the re-denomination
was Germany (1923), which, during a hyperinflation
period, cut 12 zeroes. Chronologically, our country is the
last on the list, with the re-denomination process starting
1st of July 2005. The national currency, “LEU”, lost 4
zeroes and became RON (Romanian New LEU), which
replaced the old abbreviation “ROL” (Romanian LEU).
The “LEU” expression has been kept unchanged
because it is an already accustomed term. After a few
years, « new » will be dropped from the name of
currency and RON will be called again. This
method was adopted in many countries that performed
re-denomination operation and simply the word “New”
was added before the name of the national monetary
unit, among which are Belarus, Bulgaria, Poland,
Turkey, Russia (data appendix). In hyperinflation
countries, such as Argentina, Brazil and Israel, which
had to remove zeros from their currencies several times,
different names have been preferred to prevent confusion
between old and new money.
To facilitate the recognition of banknotes and to
prevent confusion in the transition to new currencies,
denominations with the same purchasing power will be
printed in similar colors and designs for both issues.
Practices in several countries reveal that a maximum of 6
or 7 banknote denominations is the best; otherwise some
banknote denominations remain out of use.
Starting 1st of July 2005, in Romania, 6 new bank
notes and 4 new coins are issued and it will be the last
Romanian money until 2012, when we switch to EURO.
The introduction of the RON, even though not changing
the essence of the national currency, is seen by the
authorities as a signal that the LEU has regained its
significant economic value. During the 15 years of
hyperinflation, the LEU was subject to an important
depreciation, from 14.92 per USD (31st of
December 1989 – NBR source) to 29,500 per
USD in July 2005.
In Poland, the re-denomination of Zloty took place in
January 1995 under the name of “the crossing out of
four zeroes” and made the Polish currency convertible
according to international standards. But the
mathematical procedure in itself was seen by the polish
as a robbery attempt by the government.
These fears were encountered mainly in former
communist countries where the re-denomination was
repeatedly used by the State to take away the
population’s savings. However, the measure proved to
have long term benefits, due to a stabilized economy
and low inflation.
Table 1: Technical details regarding re-denomination
Eastern and Central Europe
Country Date Double
display
Parallel
use
Exchange
period
Poland Jan
1995
24
months
24
months
14 years
Ukraine Sept
1996
15 days 15 days 15 days
Russia Jan
1998
13
months
12
months
4 years
Bulgaria July
1999
6
months
6
months
unlimited
Turkey Jan
2005
12
months
12
months
10 years
Romania July
2005
16
months
18
months
3 years
Source: BNR
Electronic copy available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1347407
In July-August 1993, the Russian government gave
citizens just a few days to trade in their Soviet-era
rubles, and panic ensued. These "reforms" were "sprung"
on the population without official warning, and by
limiting the time period in which old bank notes could
be exchanged for new ones, they outraged the population
and further damaged confidence in the ruble.
During the re-denomination that took place in January
1998 (table 1), the new ruble (1,000 old rubles)
circulated in parallel with the old one for 1 year. The
declared purpose of the re-denomination was to simplify
the economic activity, as it did not affect the money
supply or the population savings.
The ruble's re-denomination occurred nearly a year
after a similar reform in Ukraine, under which the
Hryvnya was substituted for the temporary Karbovanets
at the rate of 1 to 100,000 in August 1996. Both
Hryvnias and Karbovanets were used in cash circulation
for 15 days: September 2-16, 1996, with a gradual
withdrawal of the latter (table 1). The use of
Karbovanets for all kind of payments was stopped after
September 1996 and Hryvnia became the only legal
tender of payment within Ukraine. Foreign analysts
greeted the implementation of monetary reform,
considering the introduction of the Ukrainian currency-
Hryvnia, as the starting point for stabilization of the
Ukrainian economy.
On the 5th of July 1999, the Old Bulgarian Lev was
replaced by a new Lev in a ratio of 1:1,000 (figure 1). As
of that date 1,000 old Lev equaled 1 new Lev (equal to 1
Deutsche Mark, 0.51 Euro or USD 0.55). Until
December 31st, 1999, all prices were stated both in new
and old Lev; after that date, all prices were stated in new
Lev only. The entire process was performed in order to
facilitate all payments, as well as all accounting and
exchange operations.
Figure 1
Annual inflation rate 1 month prior to the currency reform: June 1999 -
1.2 %
(Source: International Monetary Fund – International Financial
Statistics)
Referring to „the hard Lev”, Steve Hanke, one of the
initiators of the currency board arrangement in Bulgaria
is saying in an interview: „The re-denomination of the
Bulgarian Lev was an absolute waste of time. Redenomination
has no effect apart from confusing people
and wasting funds”. However, the foreign analysts
considered the measure to be useful and having positive
effects in the long run.
Starting January 1st 2005, Turkey re-denominated the
national currency (Lira) at a ratio of 1:1,000,000. The
name of the new currency is YTL („Y” stands for Yeni
- „new” - in Turkish). Old banknotes will be
withdrawn from circulation as of 1 January 2006 (after
this date, Central Bank will convert it to new banknotes
for a period of 10 years). CBRT intends also that,
during a 3 months period, to exchange the monetary
supply (90-95%).
Based on a macro overview, the Turks chose a highly
favorable moment for the re-denomination: economic
increase above 8%, inflation reduced to 9.32% in
December 2004, the launch of negotiations regarding
EU joining. The psychological impact hit two areas.
The new Turkish currency is comparable with the hard
currencies: - 1 Euro =1.6361 YTL, 1 USD =1.3448
YTL. Secondly, the accounting and financial statements
were hugely simplified, as amounts like quadrillions
were reduced - the old currency unit being one of the
weakest in the world. (table 2).
Table 2: The highest denominations in circulation
world-wide at December 31, 2004
Country Denomination Value in USD
Indonesia 100,000 12.04
Cambodia 100,000 25.06
Lebanon 100,000 66.03
Mozambique 100,000 4.24
Paraguay 100,000 16.09
Romania 1,000,000 31.01
Vietnam 100,000 6.39
Turkey 20,000,000 15.04
Source: MRI Bankers’ Guide to Foreign Currency, 2005
The lowest old banknote comprised of 50,000 Lira
and the most valuable had 20 million Liras, which
allowed buying 4 cinema tickets! The share of the
highest denomination was more than 83% of the
circulation. Currently, the total value of banknotes in
circulation was approximately 13.5 quadrillion Turkish
Liras and the number of banknotes was about 1.3 billion
pieces.
1. WHAT IS THE REASON BEHIND THE
DENOMINATION PROCESS?
The national economies might function with prices
expressed in millions, but the escalating inflation
generates a higher operational risk and continuous need
for larger banknotes issue. Multiple zeros cause
difficulties also in expressing monetary values,
transactions at the cashier’s office, book-keeping and
statistical records, data processing software, payment
systems, price tagging etc.
In Turkey, the inflationary process, which began in
the 1970s forced everybody to learn digits used in
astrophysics. Economic values were expressed in terms
of billions, trillions and even quadrillions. The cash
demand in the economy was met by new banknotes in
larger denominations, which were put to circulation
almost every two years beginning in 1981. The
enormous figures with all the zeros led to a variety of
problems. Due to its record-high denominations in the
world, Turkish Lira lost prestige in the eyes of the
general public.
As a result of the significant decline in inflation from
chronically high levels, and the steadily rising
confidence in the Lira, the decision to re-denominate the
currency was presented as part of a tight economic
program backed by the International Monetary Fund. In
the light of the above-mentioned factors, removing six
zeros from the national currency has in fact become a
technical necessity. This move could not only ease
dealing with and interpreting astronomical numbers, but
should raise the credibility of the national currency.
The first Draft Bill that aimed at removing five zeros
from Turkish Lira was presented to the Prime Ministry
on December 25, 1998. However, “zero-dropping
operation” could not be performed until 2005, due to the
facts that: the programs that were put into practice with
the aim of fighting against inflation, could not be
implemented, and expected and realized rates of
inflation could not be pulled down to reasonable levels.
In Romania, the National Bank treated the redenomination
as a part of the process of EURO
implementation. The adoption of Euro will be simplified
now, based on the experience we gathered. The necessity
of the re-denomination before the acceptance into the
EU in 2007 was questioned. However, the reason behind
this action was the fact that none of the countries that
recently joined EU were able to automatically replace
their current currency with Euro, although intense efforts
were put in place. Romania cannot “skip” these stages
when joining EU. The complete change to Euro is
foreseen to take place around 2012-2014 and only if
Romania fulfils certain criteria. The newly implemented
“RON” will therefore have a 7 to 9 years life span.
2. TIMING, COSTS AND BENEFITS OF THE REDENOMINATION
OPERATION
In theory, erasing zeros from a currency is simply a
numerical move. But past examples show it will not
work if the economy cannot sustain the new rate.
As a negative example we quote Russia’s ruble redenomination
in 1998. At that time, the ruble has been
relatively steady in real terms against the dollar since the
establishment of a monetary discipline by the RCB and
the establishment of a rouble exchange rate corridor in
July 1995. The RCB converted the corridor into a
"crawling band" in July 1996. The ruble has come under
considerable pressure in the wake of the Asian currency
crises in 1997. Plus, Russia experienced some of the
worst post-transitional inflation in East-Central Europe:
2,600 percent in 1992 and 940 percent in 1993. Inflation
began to spiral downward once a tighter monetary policy
took hold in 1993. Progress has been fairly steady, with
price increases falling to 198 percent in 1995 and 48
percent in 1996. Inflation fell further during 1997 to 14.6
percent (table 3).
Table 3: Inflation before, during and after the redenomination
in East and Central Europe
Country Inflation
during
previous
year
Inflation during
denomination
year
Inflation
during
next year
Poland 32.2% 27.8% 19.9%
Ukraine 376.7% 80.3% 15.9%
Russia 14.6% 27.6% 85.7%
Bulgaria 22.3% 2.6% 10.3%
Turkey 12% 8%*
4%*
Romania 9.3% 7%*
5%*
*estimated
Source: BNR, National Banks
The ruble was re-denominated in January 1998 with
1,000 old rubles equaling one new ruble. This redenomination
was expected to increase confidence in
the ruble. But, the government’s inability to service
mountainous debt obligations forced currency
devaluation a little over six months. The Central Bank
of Russia has been trying to convince the people that the
currency re-denomination will not cause prices to raise.
But, rumors began to spread about another government
scheme to fool the common people. The inflation rate
grew up to 85.7% in 1999.
Afghanistan’s experience is similar. The government
removed three zeros off the Afghani currency in 2002.
A short two-month conversion period caused the
currency to fall sharply as people rushed to exchange
their old Afghanis for new notes or dollar.
Removal of zeros from the currency is usually
implemented along with a stabilization program and can
be at different inflation rates. In Israel (figure 2), which
is one of the countries where the stabilization program
yielded successful results, the currency reform was
made in just a short while after the stabilization program
was launched.
Figure 2
Annual inflation rate 1 month prior to the currency unit reform:
August 1985 - 386.4 %
(Source: International Monetary Fund – International Financial
Statistics)
In Poland and Bulgaria currency reform was
implemented only after the positive effects of the
stabilization program were observed. This is the
recommended approach today.
In Poland, there were concerns that inflation was not
low enough when the re-denomination took place, but
inflation continued to moderate by five percent per
annum between 1995-1997 (table 3, figure 3). This was
because Poland had already completed a major
restructuring and liberalization of its economy, which
contributed to the success of the currency reform.
Figure 3
Annual inflation rate 1 month prior to the currency reform: December
1994 - 29.4 %
(Source: International Monetary Fund – International Financial
Statistics)
In countries where stabilization programs failed (the
examples of Argentina – figure 4 and Brazil – figure 5),
the need to remove more zeros emerged after a certain
period of time.
Figure 4
Annual inflation rate 1 month prior to the currency unit reform (May
1983 - 310.0 %; May 1985 - 1,010.1 %; December 1991 - 84.0 %)
(Source: International Monetary Fund – International Financial
Statistics)
Figure 5
Annual inflation rate 1 month prior to the currency unit reform
(January 1986 - 250.2 %; December 1988 - 980.2 %; July 1993 -
1,581.7 %)
(Source: International Monetary Fund – International Financial
Statistics)
Therefore, when the re-denomination took place in a
weak and unprepared economy, the adverse effect
occurred. Brazil repeated the process 6 times, cutting off
a total of 18 zeroes, while Argentina took 13 zeroes
during 4 stages.
In Turkey, in the process of transition to single digit
inflation, year 2005 was considered the best time for
managing expectations. The re-denomination of Turkish
Lira was effective as 1 January 2005, beginning of the
new fiscal year, in order to avoid a dual-record system,
and not to cause an extra burden of preparing interim
financial statements.
Although the re-denomination idea emerged in
Romania in 2001, the national and international political
agenda and also the economic reform schedule made it
very hard to implement. The elections in 2004, the
period needed to stabilize the inflation, the 12 months
time lag necessary to set up the technical frame and also
the upcoming EU joining in 2007 were all factors that
led the authorities to choose July 2005 as the best
implementation time.
Other actions to be taken into consideration for the
re-denomination are:
- Launching of a comprehensive advertising campaign
in all media;
- Review of the legislation and making the necessary
arrangements in this respect;
- Co-ordination of harmonization and transformation of
the accounting systems, computer software, ATMs,
POS terminals, cashier’s type machines, bank accounts,
functioning of clearing houses.
The biggest part of the costs is paid by the National
Bank. The commercial banks will pay the costs for the
ATM and POS adjustments (between 800 and 1,000
Euro per machine) and also for the re-configuration of
their core systems. In addition, appropriate storage
places for the two separate types of banknotes must be
in place. The Retailers are also subject to spending in
order to adjust their systems, cash machines etc. The
biggest impact is however in all areas that relates to
accounting.
The long-term benefits of the re-denomination are as
follows:
- Public confidence towards the national currency is reestablished;
- Savings in national currency increase;
- The money saved outside the financial system is
brought into the market, as it has to be changed.
3. CAN RE-DENOMINATION CAUSE
INFLATION?
This fear was extensively expressed in all countries
that went through a re-denomination process in the last
years. It was enhanced in 2002, when the countries
joining EU and switching to EURO encountered slight
increase in prices. The impact of Euro in the first 6
months has not exceeded 0.2% in Euro zone (according
to EUROSTAT).
The re-denomination of the national currency should
not have any noticeable effect on inflation, as the
operation is simply a zero-removal process. The only
potential effect on the general level of prices could be
the rounding up (or down) of prices post-redenomination.
Furthermore, the requirement to express
prices of all goods and services in terms of both the old
currency and the new currency should help to avoid the
exploitation of the potential rounding up possibilities.
The potential price increases that may result from redenomination
are not expected to have a continuous
nature.
In Turkey, the re-denomination was not expected to
have either an impact on exchange rates, Consumer
Price Index - CPI or the overall level of interest rates but
only a positive impact on population expectations. The
main factors determining exchange rates, price level and
overall level of interest rates are the fundamentals of the
economy and the economic stabilization program.
The recent trends (figure 6) confirmed that the
Turkish Central bank expectations proved right. The redenomination
did not have any significant impact on the
CPI increase (during the first 3 months the trend was
descendent).
Figure 6
Source: CBRT, www.tcmb.gov.tr
According to the analysts, Turkey could emulate
Poland’s successful re-denomination of the Zloty in
1995 and suggest Turkey may have broken a 20-year
cycle of inflation and high rates. More importantly, the
move is seen cementing a process of economic
normalization, in line with Turkey’s drive towards
eventual EU membership.
The Consumer Confidence Index - CCI, an indicator
calculated by CBRT and State Institute of Statistics,
which monitors the population expectations and
behavior, increased throughout the last quarter of 2004
until February 2005. This evolution can be associated to
the waiting period of the re-denomination. On a larger
time lag, this indicator has a decreasing trend, but this is
not due to the currency re-denomination.
The decrease in the Consumer Confidence Index
stemmed from the deterioration in consumers’
assessments concerning their purchasing power in the
present period and general economic situation in the next
period and buying time condition of durable goods in the
present period.
When the index is above 100, it indicates an
optimistic outlook, when is below 100, it indicates
pessimistic outlook.
Figure 7: CCI evolution in Turkey before and after redenomination
Source: CBRT – News Bulletin 96, June 22, 2005, available at
www.tcmb.gov.tr
4. CONCLUSIONS
Based on the analysis above, the re-denomination of
national currency must be done only when the following
circumstances are being met:
The decrease trend of inflation is consolidated. A
low inflation rate, joined by zero-dropping
operation will improve credibility of the national
currency;
Other significant positive results are obtained,
proving the success of economic reforms and
restructuring (e.g. the real terms increase of the
GDP). It has been proved in the majority of the
countries that put in place a re-denomination
process that this operation is an indicator of the
success in lowering inflation and determination to
keep inflation under controlled margins.
If the above success factors are not in place, the redenomination
becomes a useless and expensive
“cosmetic surgery” performed on the national currency.
As far as Romania is concerned, we believe that, in
order to accurately assess the re-denomination
implications, monthly monitoring of certain indicators
(e.g. Consumer Price Index, Purchasing Power, Euro
and USD Exchange Rate, Weighted Averages of 1-
Month Deposit etc) must be in place.
In addition, based on Turkey’s experience, we
consider viable also the set up of indicators such as the
Consumer Confidence Index and Business Confidence
Index.
References (selective):
1. Dijmarescu, E. – Denominarea: experiente ale altor
tari, BNR – Conferinta de presa, noiembrie 2004
2. Isarescu, M. - Leul nou: totul se simplifica,
Dezbatere organizata de Camera de Comert si Industrie
a României si a Municipiului Bucuresti, 15 martie 2005
3. Serdengecti, S. – Re-denomination of Turkish lira by
dropping six zeros, Press conference, Central Bank of
The Republic of Turkey, Ankara, 2004
The newspaper archives of ”Saptamâna financiara”,
“Ziarul financiar”, “Capital”, “Banii Nostri”
(2004 –2005)
www.bnr.ro
www.insse.ro
www.denominare.ro
www.tcmb.gov.tr
www.country-studies.com
www.economist.com
www.ft.com
www.nytimes.com
www.imf.org
www.globalfindata.com
www.oxfordbusinessgroup.com
www.ytl.gen.tr
ifs.apdi.net/imf
epp.eurostat.cec.eu.int
***
Data appendix
Re-denomination History since 1923
Country
Date Number of
zeroes
removed
New currency unit and value
Afghanistan 2002 3 1,000 Afgani = 1 New Afgani
Albania 1965 1 10 old Leke = 1 New Lek
1995 3 1,000 Novas Kwanzas = 1
Kwanza Reajustado
Angola
1999 6 1,000,000 Kwanzas Reajustados
= 1 Kwanza
1970 2 100 Pesos = 1 Peso Ley
1983 4 10,000 Pesos Ley = 1 Peso
Argentino
1985 3 1,000 Pesos Argentinos = 1
Austral
Argentina
1992 4 10,000 Australes = 1 Peso
Convertible
Azerbaijan 1992 1 10 Soviet Rubles = 1 Manat
Bahrain 1965 1 10 Gulf Rupees = 1 Dinar
1992 1 10 Soviet Belarus Rubles = 1 Rubel
2000 3 1,000 Rubles= 1 New Ruble
1963 3 1,000 Bolivianos = 1 Peso
Boliviano
Bolivia
1987 6 1,000,000 Pesos Bolivianos= 1
Boliviano
1967 3 1,000 Cruzeiros = 1 New
Cruzeiro
1970 3 1,000 New Cruzeiros = 1
Cruzeiro
1986 3 1,000 Cruzeiros = 1 Cruzado
1989 3 1,000 Cruzados = 1 New Cruzado
1990 1 New Cruzado = 1 Cruzeiro
1993 3 1,000 Cruzeiros = 1 Cruzeiro
Real
Brazil
1994 3 / rate of
convers 2.75
2,750 Cruzeiros Reais = 1 Real
Bulgaria 1962 1 10 old Leva = 1 new Leva
1999 3 1,000 old Leva = 1 new Leva
Chile 1960 3 1,000 Pesos = 1 Escudo
1975 3 1,000 Escudos = 1 Peso
China 1955 4 10,000 old Yuan = 1 new Yuan
Croatia 1994 3 1,000 croation Dinara = 1 Kuna
1967 3 1,000 Congolese Francs = 1 Zaire
1993 6/ rate of
conv 3
3,000,000 Zaires = 1 New Zaire
Dem
Republic of
Congo
1998 5 100,000 New Zaires = 1 Franc
Congolaise
Estonia 1992 1 10 Rubles = 1 Kroon
Finland 1963 2 100 old Markka = 1 new Markka
France 1960 2 100 francs = 1 new Francs
Georgia 1995 6 1,000,000 Kuponi = 1 Lari
1923 12 1,000,000,000,000 Mark = 1
Rentenmark
Germany
1948 1 10 Reichsmark = 1 deutsche
Mark
Greece 1954 3 1,000 old Drachmai = 1 new
Drachma
Guinea 1971 1 10 Francs = 1 Syli
Hungary 1946 5/ rate of
convers 4
400,000 Quadrillion Pengoe = 1
Forint
Island 1981 2 100 old Kronur = 1 Krona
1948 3 1,000 Prutot = 1 Pound
1960 2 100 Agorot = 1 Pound
1980 1 10 Pounds = 1 Sheqel
Israel
1985 3 1,000 old Sheqalim = 1 new
Sheqel
Kirgistan 1993 2/ rate of
conv 2
200 Rubles = 1 Som
North Korea 1959 2 100 old Won = 1 new Won
South Korea 1962 1 10 Hwan = 1 Won
1976 1/ rap of
conv 2
20 Old Kip = 1 Lao Liberation
Kip
Laos
1979 2 100 Liberation Kip = 1 New Kip
Latvia 1993 2 100 Talonu = 1 Litas
Letonia 1993 2 / rate of
conv 2
200 Rublu = 1 Lats
Macedonia 1993 2 100 old Denari = 1 new Denari
Mexico 1993 3 1,000 Pessos = 1 new Peso
Moldova 1993 3 1,000 Ruble = 1 Leu
Morocco 1959 2 100 francs = 1 Dirham
Nicaragua 1988 3 1,000 Cordobas = 1 new Cordoba
Paraguay 1943 2 100 Pesos Fuertes = 1 Guarani
Peru 1985 3 1,000 Soles = 1 Inti
1991 6 1,000,000 Intis = 1 New Sol
Poland 1995 4 10,000 old Zlotych = 1 New Zloty
1947 4 / rate of
conv 2
Romania 20,000 old Lei = 1 Leu
2005 4 10,000 old lei = 1 new Leu
1947 1 10 old Rubles = 1 New Ruble
1961 1 10 rubles = 1 new Ruble
Russian
1998 3 1,000 Rubles = 1 New Ruble
1966 2 100 Dinars = 1 new Dinar
1990 4 10,000 Dinars = 1 new Dinar
1992 1 10 Dinars = 1 new Dinar
1993
(oct)
6 1,000,000 Dinars = 1 (October)
Dinar
1993
(oct)
9 1,000,000,000 (October) Dinars =
1 (1994) Dinar
Serbia &
Montenegro
1994 6 / rate of
conv 12
12,000,000 (1994) Dinars = 1
super Dinar
Sudan 1992 1 10 Pounds = 1 Dinar
Taiwan 1949 4/ rate of
conv 4
40,000 Taiwan Dollars = 1 new
Taiwan Dollars
Tunisia 1958 3 1,000 Francs = 1 Dinar
Turkey 2005 6 1,000,000 Lirasi = 1 New Lirasi
Uganda 1987 2 100 Shilings = 1 new Shilling
Ukraine 1996 5 100,000 Karbovanets = 1 Hryvnia
Uruguay 1975 3 1,000 Pesos oro = 1 new Peso
1993 3 1,000 new Pesos = 1 Peso
Uruguayo
Uzbekistan 1994 3 1,000 Sum-coupons = 1 Sum-note
1959 3 1,000 Dong (north) = 1 new Dong
(north)
1975 2 / rate of
conv 5
500 Piastres (south) = 1 new
south Vietnam Dong
Vietnam
1985 1 10 Dong = 1 new Dong
Source: Adapted from MRI Bankers’ Guide to Foreign Currency 46th
Edition, Houston, January 2003, www.tcmb.gov.tr
Originally Posted by RWofWA
