
Originally Posted by
Anaconda_Dinar_Sheik
The dangerous consequences of defeat
No one can seriously deny that the United States is now facing the possibility of a strategic defeat in both Iraq and Afghanistan. It may not be defeat in the conventional sense of a military rout, a forced withdrawal of troops or an abject surrender, but it is certainly a failure to meet declared American objectives.
True and the Liberals in this country couldn't be happier.
What this will mean to future events will be devastating.
RUSH: Darfur, in the Sudan, there is a genocide going on there, and we've got to do something, and the liberal left is talking about sending troops and military apparatus in order to stop this genocide in Darfur.
CALLER: Well, it tells me that the paradigm is wrong. We definitely need to realize that this country is the most wonderful thing that the world has as far as --
RUSH: You gotta understand, Renee, there are Americans who don't agree with that, who think just the opposite. That's why when our national interests are being defended, they oppose it because we don't deserve to be offended because we're guilty of X, Y, and Z, and we have caused all this hatred against us. So we must go other places where we have no national interests. It's okay to lose our treasure there. It's okay to lose troops. It's okay to spill blood. It's okay to spend money in these places that have no bearing on our national interests or security. But, boy, beware if we send our soldiers where our national interests are at stake, the left is going to stand up in unison and oppose that. You people stop and think about that. Thanks for your call. I gotta run. http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/
******************************
Iraq has 30 trillion dinars in circulation